Wikidata:Properties for deletion/P500
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Not done No support for deletion. - Nikki (talk) 10:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
exclave of (P500): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)
As long as located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) is correctly interpeted as "located in and part of" (e.g. Llívia (Q13745) located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) Lower Cerdanya (Q12787) and not Llívia (Q13745) located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) Pyrénées-Orientales (Q12709)), we does not need another property to cover the same information. Previous request: Wikidata:Properties_for_deletion/Archive/2017#Property:P500 —GZWDer (talk) 18:05, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Comment I can't see how located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) is enough. For example, both Llívia (Q13745) and Puigcerdà (Q13765) have located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) Lower Cerdanya (Q12787), none of them has located in the administrative territorial entity (P131) Pyrénées-Orientales (Q12709)), and both have shares border with (P47) with several parts of Pyrénées-Orientales (Q12709)). However, Llívia (Q13745) is an enclave and Puigcerdà (Q13765) isn't. How are we supposed to tell the difference without exclave of (P500) and related properties?--Pere prlpz (talk) 17:35, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment Why do you try again with no new arguments to respond to "keep votes" in Wikidata:Properties_for_deletion/Archive/2017#Property:P500 ?. Thanks, Amadalvarez (talk) 12:13, 16 September 2023 (UTC)