Wikidata:Property proposal/ACTD ID
ACTD ID edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
Not done
Description | ID in the Arquivo Científico Tropical Digital Repository |
---|---|
Data type | External identifier |
Domain | mostly biology |
Allowed values | alphanumeric |
Example | Codex of Bastião Lopes (Q18244467) → SEPV088 Hibiscus rhodanthus (Q15373774) → LISC020128 |
Formatter URL | http://actd.iict.pt/view/actd:$1 |
NMaia (talk) 20:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Comment In this example... Hibiscus rhodanthus (Q15373774) → LISC020128 Could it be the identifier LISC020128 were actually representing a particular sample of Hibiscus rhodanthus taken in 1963 and belonging to Arquivo Científico Tropical Digital, and not the Hibiscus rhodanthus species itself (item Hibiscus rhodanthus (Q15373774))? Strakhov (talk) 13:34, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Strakhov: that is possible, although I cannot say for certain. What we know is that for creative works this wouldn't be an issue, as in the first example. NMaia (talk) 12:23, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
- Well, there is that minor dichotomy between 'work' and 'edition' and I admit I really don't know how it's handled nowadays as far as external identifiers are involved. More opinions are appreciated, of course. Strakhov (talk) 12:33, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Strakhov: that is possible, although I cannot say for certain. What we know is that for creative works this wouldn't be an issue, as in the first example. NMaia (talk) 12:23, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose until the issue raised by Strakhov is resolved. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:37, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
@NMaia, Strakhov, Pigsonthewing: Not done, no consensus. As pointed out by Strakhov, this seems to be a catalog of individual specimens, and therefore not really suitable for Wikidata. --Srittau (talk) 17:59, 7 August 2016 (UTC)