Wikidata:Property proposal/Australian Women's Register ID
Australian Women's Register ID edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person
| Description | identifier for a person or organisation in the Australian Women's Register, an online compilation of biographical data about Australian women and their organisations, run by the National Foundation for Australian Women in conjunction with The University of Melbourne. |
|---|---|
| Represents | Australian Women's Register (Q36581948) |
| Data type | External identifier |
| Domain | human (Q5), organization (Q43229) |
| Allowed values | [A-Z]{3}\d{4}[a-z] |
| Example | |
| Source | http://www.womenaustralia.info/index.html |
| External links | Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt]. |
| Planned use | adding identifiers to existing entries, maybe a mix-n-match set |
| Formatter URL | http://www.womenaustralia.info/biogs/$1.htm |
| Robot and gadget jobs | yes |
- Motivation
A useful and well curated national register of Australian women. 99of9 (talk) 02:49, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support. This looks like a useful property for authority control. YULdigitalpreservation (talk) 12:46, 22 August 2017 (UTC)- Support. Thierry Caro (talk) 17:15, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:41, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support. Jneubert (talk) 09:05, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support. A great reference and will be helpful in locating coverage gaps on Wikipedia. Canley (talk) 10:53, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
@ChristianKl: Any chance we can get this one up soon? Thanks. --99of9 (talk) 03:56, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- @99of9: I think it would be great if the description provides more information. What's the selection criteria of the database? Which authority is responsible for it? ChristianKl (talk) 12:46, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl: Ok, I've expanded both the corresponding item and the property description. More details are here. --99of9 (talk) 13:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- That's ridiculously verbose for a property description. I've trimmed it, in favour of using properties and linked items to give structured data about who operates the database. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl: Ok, I've expanded both the corresponding item and the property description. More details are here. --99of9 (talk) 13:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
