Wikidata:Property proposal/CITWF ID

CITWF film ID edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control

Done: CITWF title ID (P9146) (Talk and documentation)

Description	identifier for a film in the Complete Index to World Film (citwf.com)
Represents	Complete Index to World Film (Q2990430)
Data type	External identifier
Domain	film (Q11424)
Allowed values	\d+
Example 1	The Seventh Seal (Q217189) → 322497
Example 2	Ali: Fear Eats the Soul (Q543810) → 15991
Example 3	Tokyo Story (Q26060) → 353754
Source	https://www.citwf.com/
External links	Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt].
Expected completeness	always incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URL	https://citwf.com/film$1.htm
See also	IMDb ID (P345) CITWF person ID (P8977)

Motivation edit

Complete Index to World Film (Q2990430) is a large database covering world film; adding it would improve our coverage of film. Trivialist (talk) 16:50, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Movies has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. Trivialist (talk) 16:50, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion edit

Support Very interesting. ButI rather see identifiers on the entire site: personXXXXX and filmXXXXXX (formatter URL: http://citwf.com/$1.htm).

What do you think of that, Trivialist? —Eihel (talk) 16:57, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds fine. I wasn't sure about one property having more than one type of identifier, but somehow forgot about ones like IMDb ID (P345). :) I've expanded the proposal to include people. Trivialist (talk) 22:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What about just expanding the new CITWF person ID (P8977) to cover both? It hasn't seen much use so far anyways. BrokenSegue (talk) 01:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Notifications of P8977 participants: @Trade, -akko, Epìdosis, Davidpar, Romaine, Pamputt: @Ederporto, ArthurPSmith, Trivialist, BrokenSegue: —Eihel (talk) 11:16, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question So everyone agrees: « I don't create this property, but I update P8977? »
I would Support the creation of this property only for films, while for people it's obviously fine using CITWF person ID (P8977). --Epìdosis 11:23, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Somehow I completely forgot that I proposed CITWF person ID (P8977) :) I'm fine with either a separate film proposal or expanding the existing one. Trivialist (talk) 23:30, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
—Eihel (talk) 20:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Trivialist: I adjusted this proposal to be for films only; if you really want to you can raise the question of extending the other property on its discussion page, but doing that would require changing all the existing identifiers to include the "person" prefix, so I don't think that's a good idea. Better to just let this one proceed I think! ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:23, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @ArthurPSmith: Thanks! Trivialist (talk) 00:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Trade, -akko, Epìdosis, Davidpar, Romaine, Pamputt: and @Ederporto, ArthurPSmith, Trivialist, BrokenSegue: Done CITWF title ID (P9146) —Eihel (talk) 08:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
nb. The links on the identifiers will be available in 12 to 48 hours.
WikiProject Movies has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead. —Eihel (talk) 08:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]