Wikidata:Property proposal/Cup size 2
cup size edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person
Not done
| Description | size characteristics of a bra |
|---|---|
| Represents | bra size (Q2608071) |
| Data type | Quantity |
| Example 1 | Roos van Montfort (Q15881468)cupsize<B cup> [1] |
| Example 2 | Peta Todd (Q2286931)cupsize<F cup> [2] |
| Example 3 | Noa Eikawa (Q27917706)cupsize<B cup> |
| Example 4 | Denice Lam (Q65312947)cupsize<D cup> [3] |
| Example 5 | Cathryn Li (Q18683006)cupsize<C cup> [4] |
| Example 6 | Sabrina Pai (Q8957832)cupsize<B cup> (in 2006) [5] |
| See also | Wikidata:Property proposal/bust/waist/hip measurements |
Motivation edit
Previous discussion: Wikidata:Property proposal/Cup size. Response to some oppositions and criticisms:
- I am not restricted it to use in porn actress only. In some countries cup size is not considered sensitive/sexist/misogynistic; for example they are commonly discussed (by reliable sources) in Taiwan.
- (Response to Special:Diff/1823929462) This does not mean we need a property for penis size unless it is commonly discussed in reliable sources.
- "It's out of scope for Wikidata to store all clothing & body measurements" - as it is commonly used in some Wikipedias it is useful to have such information.
- "the value is an extremely variable quantity anyway, and can depend massively on factors on the manufacturer's side" - We only store how sources said about them.
--GZWDer (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Discussion edit
Oppose Even if I lived in Taiwan I would see no compelling case made here.
- عُثمان (talk) 23:48, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Can you illustrate? GZWDer (talk) 08:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose The description of the property states that it is “the size characteristics of a bra”. However, the property is aimed at describing the woman’s breast size which I find sexist. After all, the opposition in the previous proposal pointed to this issue. M.roszkowski (talk) 17:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- What I mean: woman’s breast size is not so sexist in some cultures and thus included in some Wikipedias. GZWDer (talk) 06:49, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- It is not the job of Wikidata to ensure that all data adheres to sex negative norms. --Trade (talk) 15:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose We really don't need such information on Wikidata, in my opinion. --Gymnicus (talk) 08:43, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Support The fact that all the oppose is some variant of "i don't like this subject" is quite telling. --Trade (talk) 15:53, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose for the purely technical reason that unsourced additions of this property cannot always be prevented all the time. Mahir256 (talk) 16:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Not done, no consensus of proposed property at this time based on the above discussion. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 12:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
