Wikidata:Property proposal/DIVA record ID

DIVA record ID

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control

   Withdrawn

Description	record ID in the Swedish Digital Scientific Archive (DIVA)
Data type	String
Allowed values	[0-9]+
Example 1	A Two-Layer 3-D Reconstruction Method and Calibration for Multicamera-Based Volumetric Positioning and Characterization (Q106819387) → 1468471
Example 2	A weighted optimization approach to time-of-flight sensor fusion. (Q51145807) → 669198
Example 3	Spatio-temporal consistent depth-image-based rendering using layered depth image and inpainting (Q59438820) → 896962
Number of IDs in source	unknown
Expected completeness	always incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URL	http://diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A$1
See also	Wikidata:Property proposal/DIVA author ID

Motivation

Important property for Swedish science. --So9q (talk) 09:01, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Discussion

•  Support ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Support, an important property for science.--Arbnos (talk) 18:35, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose DIVA provides URN-NBN (P4109) which are permanent, the referenced ID isn't necessarily permanent. Abbe98 (talk) 20:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Conditional support Same objection:

  example 1 = A Two-Layer 3-D Reconstruction Method and Calibration for Multicamera-Based Volumetric Positioning and Characterization (Q106819387) → 39878

  example 2 = A weighted optimization approach to time-of-flight sensor fusion. (Q51145807) → 20415

  example 3 = Spatio-temporal consistent depth-image-based rendering using layered depth image and inpainting (Q59438820) → 26904

  example 4 = On the lifetime and usability of environmental monitoring wireless sensor networks (Q108216485) → 20046

  allowed values = [1-9]\d{0-5}

  number of ids = 30321 (20210823 : for this domain, urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-)

  formatter URL = http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-$1

  Wikidata project = WikiProject Sweden (Q11509296) (same for DiVA authority-person (P9604)). Cordially. —Eihel (talk) 14:15, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

• @So9q: Please comment on the above, this does seem like a better way to link if it is more stable. ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:06, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

  Thanks for the ping--So9q (talk) 18:21, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

  @So9q: Why withdrawn the proposal instead of replacing the fields? —Eihel (talk) 19:43, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

  @Eihel, Abbe98: I assumed that the property Abbe mentioned can be used instead? That makes this one superfluous.--So9q (talk) 15:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

  Yeah, it can be used as it is. Abbe98 (talk) 15:47, 24 August 2021 (UTC)