Wikidata:Property proposal/Enpedia ID

‎Enpedia ID

Return to Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

Under discussion

Description	identifier for an article on Enpedia
Represents	Enpedia (Q131736854)
Data type	External identifier
Domain	item
Allowed values	string
Example 1	Japanese New Year (Q701398) → 正月
Example 2	Bloom Into You (Q22932761) → やがて君になる
Example 3	Ai Kayano (Q1187078) → 茅野愛衣
Example 4	citation needed (Q3544030) → 要出典
Example 5	2024 in rail transport (Q60542990) → 2024年の鉄道
External links	Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ka] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt].
Number of IDs in source	110753
Formatter URL	https://enpedia.rxy.jp/wiki/$1
See also	NicoNicoPedia ID (P6900), Moegirlpedia ID (P5737), Namuwiki ID (P8885), Pixiv Encyclopedia ID (P11408)
Single-value constraint	yes
Distinct-values constraint	yes

Motivation

Enpedia is a Japanese encyclopedia website. It has a lot of articles of Japanese railways and Hyogo. Sometimes it might have more information than relevant Wikipedia articles.Shapez (talk) 16:59, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Support --Trade (talk) 02:15, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose : Enpedia […] includes information that cannot be published under Wikipedia's strict publication standards, such as rumors and speculations that there are few sources that can be clearly identified. Here. So it is far from an authority. —Eihel (talk) 17:01, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- NicoNicoPedia ID (P6900) and Pixiv Encyclopedia ID (P11408) are far from authorities. But they are adopted as properties. So I think it's okay. --Shapez (talk) 15:43, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Better now? Trade (talk) 21:14, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Enpedia is as authoritative a site as Niconico Pedia (Q10856286) and Pixiv Encyclopedia (Q108472060). -- 特急いよのたみ (talk) 13:48, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]