Wikidata:Property proposal/Kooora

Kooora edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Sports

Not done

Description	identifier for a soccer team, club, competition or player, mainly from the MENA region
Represents	Kooora (Q25455377)
Data type	External identifier
Template parameter	Template:Goalzz (Q18812562) en (Template available in EN/AR/FA wikis)
Domain	Person, club, team, competition
Allowed values	[a-z]+=[1-9]\d*
Example	Rafael Nadal (Q10132) → tn=39 Francesco Totti (Q20110) → player=534 Arsenal F.C. (Q9617) → team=1 2017 CAF Confederation Cup (Q23058278) → c=13604
Source	http://www.kooora.com
External links	Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt].
Planned use	import corresponding data from Wikipedia infoboxes
Formatter URL	http://www.kooora.com/?$1 (i.e. ?team=xxx for teams, ?c=xxx for competitions , ?player=xxx for players , ?tn=xxx for tennis players)
Robot and gadget jobs	none, help is welcome

Motivation

This property may be just an other boring one in a long list of DBs for soccer players in Europe but it's going to be the unique db for a lot of players evolving only in the MENA region. Since I'm not too much active in property proposals feel free to correct any error I made while creating this proposal. Helmoony (talk) 20:57, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

I think we may need four properties. Leastways, as proposed, the values must be more than integers; and the formatter URLs a do not agree with the examples. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:31, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- You mean four properties like : Kooora Tennis player ID, Kooora club ID, Kooora competition ID and Kooora sportsperson ID ? Why not! It's going to be clearer.--Helmoony (talk) 15:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:16, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with @Pigsonthewing: we need 4 properties. --Mr. Ibrahem (talk) 11:25, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the allowed values and formatter URL if we want to do this as a single property rather than 4. Either way. ArthurPSmith (talk) 20:36, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ArthurPSmith: Which way is better for bots? If neither, let's use one only, at least it's going to avoid errors while adding links.--Helmoony (talk) 01:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Helmoony: I don't think it matters either way - 4 id's would make bot code a little longer (having to list all 4 property id's) but the Kooora id's would be simpler (just numbers) so it's probably a wash. ArthurPSmith (talk) 13:55, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Thierry Caro: What do you think about this property? ChristianKl (✉) 14:10, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'd rather have multiple properties but here this would eventually make a lot of them. It really depends on whether or not we are willing to get those various properties created. I'm neutral. Thierry Caro (talk) 14:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let's make 4 properties so! --Helmoony (talk) 05:03, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

marking as Not done given that there is no support vote after than more than 6 months. @Helmoony: feel free to open four new proposals for the properties suggested above. − Pintoch (talk) 16:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]