Wikidata:Property proposal/L’Équipe coach ID
L'Équipe coach ID edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person
Not done
| Description | identifier for a coach at the L’Équipe |
|---|---|
| Represents | L’Équipe (Q815748) |
| Data type | External identifier |
| Domain | human (Q5) |
| Example 1 | Luis Fernandez (Q314861) → 29 |
| Example 2 | Yuri Semin (Q554012) → 260 |
| Example 3 | Sérgio Conceição (Q317298) → 2536 |
| Source | https://www.lequipe.fr |
| External links | Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt]. |
| Planned use | for usage in stated in (P248) and for Template:Authority control (Q3907614) |
| Expected completeness | eventually complete (Q21873974) |
| Formatter URL | https://www.lequipe.fr/Football/FootballFicheEntraineur$1.html |
| Robot and gadget jobs | Maybe check captures in Internet Archive for just in case? |
| See also | TuttoCalciatori.net coach ID (P7035) |
Motivation edit
Will be useful for stated in (P248). Contains valueable statistical data by football coaches L’Équipe. --Mitte27 (talk) 16:34, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Discussion edit
- Seems to cover enough notable people. The website also covers other sports, e.g. https://www.lequipe.fr/Tennis/TennisFicheJoueur7452.html. Should a property be made to cover all of them or just coaches? Infrastruktur (talk) 11:38, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Support Since there are existing L'Equipe properties for football players and teams, it makes sense to keep using many properties I guess. Infrastruktur (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
- retracting vote because the source is of poor quality. Infrastruktur (talk) 12:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support,
Notified participants of WikiProject France —MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 07:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC) 
Oppose, Not up to date, for example : Olivier Frapolli --Football Lab (talk) 23:17, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- How out of date is that? Edit: It's six years, that's pretty bad. Infrastruktur (talk) 11:49, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
Not done @Mitte27: Concluding the proposal since it was shown that the source was of poor quality. Infrastruktur (talk) 13:16, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
