Wikidata:Property proposal/Latin name

Latin nameEdit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Natural science

   Not done
DescriptionLatin name for anatomical subject
Data typeString
Template parameteren:template:Infobox artery -->
Examplehepatic artery proper (Q542166)arteria hepatica propria
Motivation

Tobias1984
Doc James
User:Bluerasberry
Wouterstomp
Gambo7
Daniel Mietchen
Andrew Su
Peter.C
Klortho
Remember
Matthiassamwald
Projekt ANA
Andrux
Pavel Dušek
Was a bee
Alepfu
FloNight
Genewiki123
Emw
emitraka
Lschriml
Mvolz
Franciaio
User:Lucas559
User:Jtuom
Chris Mungall
ChristianKl
Gstupp
Geoide
Sintakso
علاء
Dr. Abhijeet Safai
Adert
CFCF
Jtuom
Lucas559
Drchriswilliams
Okkn
CAPTAIN RAJU
LeadSongDog
Ozzie10aaaa
Sami Mlouhi
Marsupium
Netha Hussain
Abhijeet Safai
ShelleyAdams
Fractaler
Seppi333
Shani Evenstein
Csisc
linuxo
Arash
Morgankevinj
Anandhisuresh
TiagoLubiana
ZI Jony
Antoine2711
Viveknalgirkar
JustScienceJS
Leptospira
Scossin
  Notified participants of WikiProject Medicine Used in many of anatomy template. Thanks for your attention! Adert (talk) 12:27, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Discussion
  •   Oppose Use the Latin label. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose Duplicate with the Latin label Snipre (talk) 08:55, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Oppose The Latin label should do the job for now. After the Wikidictionary integration we can revisit the subject with the new possibilities. ChristianKl (talk) 07:52, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment the property label is too generic. If it's to hold specialized terminology, it would need a more specific one. We do have taxon name (P225) for taxa. The generic property you could use is name (P2561).
    --- Jura 09:07, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Support but I would call it "Terminologia Anatomica". Terminologia Anatomica (Q286567) is an international standard for human anatomical structures. It is not necessarily the same as the Latin label. The Latin label might be taken from another standard or might be the term used for other species. --Pasleim (talk) 11:15, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
  Not done@Adert: Either use the label Latin, or the property name (P2561), or make a more specific proposal.--Micru (talk) 20:17, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
  •   Comment I undid the premature closure. This should run for at least 7 days and given the backlog, closing this isn't really a priority. In the meantime, there is also Wikidata:Property proposal/TA98 Latin term.
    --- Jura 21:21, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
    • @Jura1: I reverted your re-opening. Nowhere on WD:PTC says that property proposals cannot be closed prematurely, specially given the case that for this one there is a consensus about its inadequacy, and that there is an alternative proposal.--Micru (talk) 21:36, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
      • I think the initial oppositions had been addressed and an alternate property label was suggested. I don't see why you don't want to participate in the discussion and insist on closing it, merely to avoid that your proposal gets assessed in this discussion. If you want to propose an alternate label, you should do this as other participants in this project do, not as a property creator.
        --- Jura 21:49, 19 January 2017 (UTC)