Wikidata:Property proposal/Mapa ID
Mapa place ID edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
Description | identifier for a place, in the Mapa database of places in Israel |
---|---|
Data type | External identifier |
Allowed values | \d+ |
Example | Marj Naaja (Q28914207) → 4108 |
Formatter URL | http://www.mapa.co.il/ng/buildrecord.asp?id=$1 |
Robot and gadget jobs | yes |
- Motivation
I want the ID's to be added to wikidata and then add a template connecting the site in hewiki. Mikey641 (talk) 10:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose - This is a paid web site, see here Hanay (talk) 14:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- The site doesn't require any payment. Do you need to pay anything in order to view this page, this page, etc? No.--Mikey641 (talk) 15:47, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- This property proposal lacks a description of the property. ChristianKl (talk) 15:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- ChristianKl Added a description--Mikey641 (talk) 15:47, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- That's a description but it doesn't tell me much about the property. What kind of database about places happens to be? Maybe there's an organisation behind it?
If everything is a place the name might also be "Mapa place ID". ChristianKl (talk) 15:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)- ChristianKl There is an organization Mapa (Q2903475) - i Israeli cartographic and book publishing company. I changed it to "Mapa place ID"--Mikey641 (talk) 16:07, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- That's a description but it doesn't tell me much about the property. What kind of database about places happens to be? Maybe there's an organisation behind it?
- ChristianKl Added a description--Mikey641 (talk) 15:47, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- Support. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:34, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Mikey641, Hanay, Pigsonthewing: Done ChristianKl (talk) 18:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- ChristianKl, I do not understand the Done. I was against it for a good reason, There was 1 support. Why you accept it? Hanay (talk) 18:20, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Hanay: Mikey641 did address the fact that the website doesn't require payment for data to get viewed and you didn't reply to that. That leaves one person who's concerns were addressed who was against the proposal and three people in total who think having the property makes sense. ChristianKl (talk) 09:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- @ChristianKl: Mikey641 and I had a discussion on this subject on Hebrew wiki. I saw pages on their web site that were closed to readers that do not have subscription to the site. I sent them an e-mail and ask them directly what is the policy of the site on this subject, and are they willing to open the enciclopedia part of the site to readers that enter to site, through links from Hebrew wiki. I am waiting to their answer. Hanay (talk) 07:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Hanay: Mikey641 did address the fact that the website doesn't require payment for data to get viewed and you didn't reply to that. That leaves one person who's concerns were addressed who was against the proposal and three people in total who think having the property makes sense. ChristianKl (talk) 09:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- ChristianKl, I do not understand the Done. I was against it for a good reason, There was 1 support. Why you accept it? Hanay (talk) 18:20, 22 March 2017 (UTC)