Wikidata:Property proposal/Online catalog
online catalog edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work
Description | online catalog for this library |
---|---|
Represents | online catalog (Q101191533) |
Data type | URL |
Domain | library catalog (Q856638) |
Example 1 | Bibliothèque de l'Institut du monde arabe (Q100594626) → http://bima-catalogue.imarabe.org |
Example 2 | Bibliothèque Diderot (Q100594747) → http://rechercher.bibliotheque-diderot.fr |
Example 3 | Bibliothèque nationale de France (Q193563) → https://catalogue.bnf.fr |
See also | P4354 |
@Hsarrazin: Nomen ad hoc (talk) 10:55, 19 October 2020 (UTC).
- Support --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 19:01, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support NMaia (talk) 10:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support There are currently 1173 items with described at URL (P973)<url>
instance of (P31)library catalog (Q856638) which could be migrated. --Nw520 (talk) 19:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Question Could / should this also be used for museums and galleries that have a searchable catalogue of their collections? What if the coverage is only partial (e.g. only a portion of items are catalogued to date) or there are separate collection catalogues within the one institution site? —Pelagic (talk) 20:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Pelagic. I would answer (i) yes indeed; (ii) perhaps use expected completeness (P2429) to qualify catalog's completeness? But this property appears to be for internal use...; (iii) one claim for one catalog; if for instance an institution as three catalogs, three claims. Best, Nomen ad hoc (talk) 15:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC).
- Excellent, thanks, Nomen ad hoc! I see the property has been created with a broad constraint (property constraint (P2302)allowed-entity-types constraint (Q52004125)
item of property constraint (P2305)Wikibase item (Q29934200), so that it could be used with anything which has an online catalogue (gallery collection, union catalogue, ...) per user discretion. Pelagic (talk) 08:37, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
- Excellent, thanks, Nomen ad hoc! I see the property has been created with a broad constraint (property constraint (P2302)allowed-entity-types constraint (Q52004125)
- Hi Pelagic. I would answer (i) yes indeed; (ii) perhaps use expected completeness (P2429) to qualify catalog's completeness? But this property appears to be for internal use...; (iii) one claim for one catalog; if for instance an institution as three catalogs, three claims. Best, Nomen ad hoc (talk) 15:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC).
- Support--Simon Cobb (User:Sic19 ; talk page) 07:20, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Support Susanna Giaccai (talk) 07:57, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
Notified participants of WikiProject Libraries, BTW. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 06:34, 3 November 2020 (UTC).
Notified participants of WikiProject Museums. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 06:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC).
- Support we were discussing about this issue by mail last week with someone from the field... it's necessary, very few ID can link directly to a catalogue. I welcome all feedbacks to refine the concept, but I think it's a clear gap.--Alexmar983 (talk) 08:07, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
@Nomen ad hoc, Tinker Bell, NMaia, Nw520, Pelagic: @Sic19, Giaccai, Alexmar983: Done online catalog URL (P8768). --Epìdosis 09:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)