Wikidata:Property proposal/Property creation discussion
Property creation discussionEdit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Property metadata
Description | URL of the page on which the creation of the property was discussed |
---|---|
Data type | URL |
Domain | properties |
Example | KML file (P3096) -> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/KML_file |
Seems better than what is currently done, ie a free-text |subpage parameter in {{Property documentation}}
. Alternatively, datatype could be item, but I don't think we need an item for every property proposal. --Zolo (talk) 14:37, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion
- @Zolo: Your example seems incomplete. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:09, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing: yes indeed, fixed now. --Zolo (talk) 17:20, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:37, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing: yes indeed, fixed now. --Zolo (talk) 17:20, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:37, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support. Thryduulf (talk) 20:32, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
- URL vice item? That doesn't make me not feel warm and fuzzy. Could also do it as a string or identifier and that way we gain the use of the gadget/service to avoid linking long links. --Izno (talk) 11:47, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- No strong opinion on that. An URL sounded sensible to point to a webpage, but a string would be consistent with Commons category (P373) / Commons Creator page (P1472). Arguably, all of those could be "external identifier" as well (they are not really "external" but that may not really matter). --Zolo (talk) 15:17, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
- External ID works for me; then we can have a formatter URL. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:17, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Current format allows to find the property proposals and is already there when the page is created based on the proposal.
--- Jura 15:15, 30 August 2016 (UTC) - Support Having information looked up on the discussion page shouldn't be the way Wikidata works. It makes sense to move as much of the information about a property as possible to the main page of the property. A bot could fill the property based on the currently available solution. ChristianKl (talk) 13:59, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
@Zolo, Pigsonthewing, Thryduulf, Jura1, ChristianKl: Done Now property proposal discussion (P3254). Lymantria (talk) 15:41, 4 October 2016 (UTC)