Wikidata:Property proposal/Quebec cultural heritage directory intangible heritage ID
Quebec cultural heritage directory intangible heritage ID edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
Not done
| Description | intangible heritage listed in the Quebec cultural heritage directory |
|---|---|
| Represents | intangible cultural heritage (Q59544) |
| Data type | External identifier |
| Allowed values | [1-9]\d{0,1} |
| Example | Inuit throat singing (Q2956224) → 3 |
| Source | http://www.patrimoine-culturel.gouv.qc.ca/rpcq/rechercheImmateriel.do?methode=afficher |
| Formatter URL | http://www.patrimoine-culturel.gouv.qc.ca/rpcq/detail.do?methode=consulter&id=$1&type=imma |
| See also | Quebec cultural heritage directory ID (P633), Québec cultural heritage directory people ID (P2592) |
- Motivation
WikiProject Cultural heritage has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.
It's a small directory versus Quebec cultural heritage directory ID (P633) and Québec cultural heritage directory people ID (P2592) (Only 37 entries in total), but it's a inventory of all tiems who are in intangible cultural heritage (Q59544) in Quebec. Fralambert (talk) 01:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
- Discussion
Support --Beat Estermann (talk) 21:45, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Oppose If there are only 37 entries, use described at URL (P973). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:05, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Pigsonthewing: We don't really have rule about the minimum of entries. I was checking and this was sensibly the same number of entries of Heritage Lighthouse of Canada ID (P3211) when I proposed it (Now P3211 is at 65 entries). Also I wanted to propose this new property because the format URL is different of Quebec cultural heritage directory ID (P633) and Québec cultural heritage directory people ID (P2592). Also it's seasier for programming contraint when we have a property. --Fralambert (talk) 22:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- On the one hand I don't want to create unnecessary properties. On the other hand I do think that Wikidata should support the open heritage efforts and if it makes managing the cultural heritage easier to create this property I'm not opposed to creating it. Are there other people of the cultural heritage project who think properties like this with only 37 entries have significant value to the project? ChristianKl (talk) 21:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose 37? No. Multichill (talk) 20:57, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Multichill, Fralambert, Beat Estermann, Pigsonthewing: Not done, use described at URL (P973). ChristianKl (talk) 10:38, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
