Wikidata:Property proposal/Twitter list ID

Twitter list ID

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

   Done: Twitter list ID (P10804) (Talk and documentation)

Description	identifier of a list of accounts on Twitter
Represents	Twitter list (Q111603184)
Data type	External identifier
Domain	item
Allowed values	\d+
Example 1	Russo-Ukrainian War (Q15860072) → 1498457571216134144; qualifiers: publisher (P123): Twitter, Inc. (Q1390577)
Example 2	United States Senate (Q66096) → 63915645; qualifiers: publisher (P123): Twitter, Inc. (Q1390577)
Example 3	Google (Q95) → 42906849; qualifiers: publisher (P123): Google (Q95)
Example 4	Minecraft Marketplace (Q108600562) → 974282497700892673; qualifiers: publisher (P123): Minecraft (Q49740)
Example 5	The Washington Post (Q166032) → 1346797050399248388; qualifiers: author name string (P2093): Teddy Amenabar
Source	https://twitter.com/i/lists/suggested
External links	Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt].
Expected completeness	always incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URL	https://twitter.com/i/lists/$1
See also	X topic ID (P8672), Quora topic ID (P3417), hashtag (P2572)
Applicable "stated in"-value	X (Q918)

Motivation

Twitter lists are feeds that show Tweets and retweets from a specified list of profiles. Since anyone can make a list, like subreddits and many other properties on Wikidata, only official or relevant lists should be used. These include lists created by an organization responsible for an item, lists created by verified accounts/news publications/journalists, lists with many followers, or lists followed by a relevant organization.

The examples I gave use the qualifier publisher (P123) or author name string (P2093) to specify who or what organization created the list.

Items can be interests, companies, people, communities, products, current events, diseases, locations, and pretty much anything people may want to read about, also similar to subreddit (P3984).

AntisocialRyan (Talk) 20:55, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Discussion

•  Comment @AntisocialRyan: You mean publisher (P123) or author name string (P2093). Would author (P50) be considered also for identified people? I'm a little dubious about this as there could be thousands of lists for some topics from different sources. But maybe if it's more limited to the official twitter ones and similar ones that might be ok. ArthurPSmith (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

  @ArthurPSmith: I'm not sure about the qualifier, I feel like it is more publishing than authoring, but there's no publisher name string.

  And for the scope, I outlined it in the Motivation: "These include lists created by an organization responsible for an item, lists created by verified accounts/news publications/journalists, lists with many followers, or lists followed by a relevant organization."

  Many identifiers that we have are user-generated but it is usually clear which values should be included. AntisocialRyan (Talk) 15:39, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment I have 107 IDs ready for a quickstatement. AntisocialRyan (Talk) 20:55, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Ok, I guess I'm fine with this as proposed. ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

  Oh I just saw the typo you were pointing out, sorry! If author would make more sense though let me know and I'll change it. Thanks! AntisocialRyan (Talk) 21:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Lectrician1 (talk) 01:38, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 09:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC).

@AntisocialRyan, ArthurPSmith, Lectrician1, Nomen ad hoc: Done --Trade (talk) 21:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)