Wikidata:Property proposal/Wikiapiary entry

WikiApiary entry

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

   Not done

Description	links to the entry of this MediaWiki site/extension/skin
Represents	WikiApiary (Q26252471)
Data type	External identifier
Domain	MediaWiki website (Q15633582), MediaWiki extension (Q6805426) and MediaWiki skin (Q21996535)
Allowed values	alphabetical
Example 1	English Wikisource (Q15156406) → Wikisource_(en)
Example 2	Extension:VisualEditor (Q21679100) → Extension:VisualEditor
Example 3	Minerva Neue (Q22713032) → Skin:Minerva_Neue
Source	https://wikiapiary.com/
External links	Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt].
Planned use	every MediaWiki sites, extensions and skins
Number of IDs in source	as of now, 269654 sites, 269827 extensions, and 65535 skins
Expected completeness	always incomplete (Q21873886)
Formatter URL	https://wikiapiary.com/wiki/$1
Robot and gadget jobs	maybe

Motivation

Many MediaWiki stuffs are collected by this site, so why not? --125.36.185.115 03:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Discussion

•  Support David (talk) 07:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose just one property for three different concepts is too confusion for us to be useful. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:37, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Liuxinyu970226 (but I would support three separate properties, given the quantities involved). As a meta issue, we should decide at which point we stop combining IDs like this, and split them. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:58, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

  @Kghbln: Thoughts? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:32, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

•  Neutral WikiApiary actually has five concepts, i.e. websites, farms, extensions, skins and generators. I believe that WikiApiary is quite important within the MediaWiki ecosystem so being able to add statements will be advantageous, most importantly for tracking usage over time. Not sure if Wikidata would like to do this. --[[kgh]] (talk) 14:59, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

  @MarkAHershberger: Thoughts? --[[kgh]] (talk) 17:26, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

•  Neutral Um... wow. I hadn't even thought of this. Since I'm a complete newb when it comes to WikiData, I wonder how you who are more experienced would say this should be done.--MarkAHershberger (talk) 19:16, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

  @ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, Pigsonthewing, Kghbln, MarkAHershberger: So how to split this property request to five different requests? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:31, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

•  Support of splitting this proposal. --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 20:11, 15 April 2019 (UTC)