Wikidata:Property proposal/conservation status system
conservation status system edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Natural science
Withdrawn
Description | Use as qualifier of IUCN conservation status (P141), which will be renamed to "conservation status" |
---|---|
Data type | Item |
Template parameter | status_system at Template:taxobox |
Domain | species |
Allowed values | conservation status system (we need a new item for this) |
Example | Calochortus tiburonensis (Q5023121) IUCN conservation status (P141) <new item "Critically Imperiled">, qualifier <conservation status system> NatureServe conservation status (Q2712784) |
Source | Wikipedia and others |
Robot and gadget jobs | bot to add IUCN2.3/IUCN3.1 to existing IUCN conservation status (P141) values (probably need two new items) |
- Motivation
(Add your motivation for this property here.) GZWDer (talk) 08:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- Discussion
Comment I am not sure this property is necessary. If we just add appropriate instance of (P31) statements to the target items of the conversation status property, you can use any system you like without the need of a qualifier, it seems to me. ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- @GZWDer: Please „your motivation for this property here“ Thanks. --Succu (talk) 21:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.
BTW: Oppose --Succu (talk) 21:02, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Succu: the IUCN conservation status (P141) is currently IUCN only. Should we broaden it to other conservation status systems?--GZWDer (talk) 03:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- No. --Succu (talk) 07:38, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Dan Koehl (talk) 08:11, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Succu, Dan Koehl: Should we propose new properties for NatureServe conservation status and other type of conservation statuses?--GZWDer (talk) 12:32, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- See NatureServe Conservation Status for the differences. If you want to add this data to Wikidata and then maintain it you can of course propose a new property. It's hard enough to do this for IUCN conservation status (P141). --Succu (talk) 14:47, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- I have withdrawn the request in favor of Wikidata:Property proposal/NatureServe conservation status.--GZWDer (talk) 14:56, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
- See NatureServe Conservation Status for the differences. If you want to add this data to Wikidata and then maintain it you can of course propose a new property. It's hard enough to do this for IUCN conservation status (P141). --Succu (talk) 14:47, 18 January 2017 (UTC)