Wikidata:Property proposal/does not have quality (2)
does not have qualityEdit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
It is often important to specify that an item does not have a quality that it might otherwise be expected to have, e.g. a quality that other members of its class have. Analogous to does not have part (P3113), which is sometimes made to fit this purpose.
This property was proposed about four months ago and closed for insufficient support, though no real opposition was apparent. It was noted then that using has quality (P1552) with "no value" or an "opposite" value are not generally workable alternatives. Hopefully, new examples will motivate discussion.
- Support Valid property, you have my support again Germartin1 (talk) 13:52, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Thierry Caro (talk) 04:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 18:23, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support Dhx1 (talk) 14:52, 2 February 2019 (UTC)