Open main menu

Wikidata:Property proposal/does not have quality (2)

< Wikidata:Property proposal

does not have qualityEdit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

Descriptionexpected quality that the item does not possess
Representsquality (Q1207505)
Data typeItem
Example 1Q60196038 does not have quality access (Q57699905) / of (P642) Panama Canal (Q7350)
Example 2predatory lending (Q949033) -> morality (Q48324)
Example 3public statement (Q52947181) -> confidentiality (Q2476929)
Example 4dark photon (Q19358317) -> rest mass (invariant mass) or rest energy (Q1097654)
Example 5Open Referral (Q17513556) has part (P527) consultant (Q15978655) / does not have quality definiteness (Q1182686)
Planned useMigration of statements using existing properties like does not have part (P3113) and excluding (P1011) to approximate this meaning
See alsohas quality (P1552), does not have part (P3113), excluding (P1011)


It is often important to specify that an item does not have a quality that it might otherwise be expected to have, e.g. a quality that other members of its class have. Analogous to does not have part (P3113), which is sometimes made to fit this purpose.

This property was proposed about four months ago and closed for insufficient support, though no real opposition was apparent. It was noted then that using has quality (P1552) with "no value" or an "opposite" value are not generally workable alternatives. Hopefully, new examples will motivate discussion.

@Circeus, Pigsonthewing, Germartin1, TomT0m, ArthurPSmith: --Swpb (talk) 18:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)


  •   Support Valid property, you have my support again Germartin1 (talk) 13:52, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support. Thierry Caro (talk) 04:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support ChristianKl❫ 18:23, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
  •   Support Dhx1 (talk) 14:52, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

@ChristianKl, Thierry Caro, Germartin1, Swpb, Dhx1:   Done: does not have quality (P6477). − Pintoch (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2019 (UTC)