Wikidata:Property proposal/given name identical to this family name

given name identical to this family nameEdit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Person

   Not done
DescriptionThe given name/first name spelled the same was as this surname/family name is
Data typeItem
Domainfamily names/surnames
Allowed valuesitems for given names
Example 1Sylvain (Q18001608) (family name): Sylvain (Q16281827) (given name)
Example 2Jacob (Q1677404) (family name): Jacob (Q25999604) (given name)
Example 3Martin (Q12035675) (family name): Martin (Q18002399) (given name)
Expected completenessalways incomplete (Q21873886)
See alsofamily name identical to this given name (P1533)

MotivationEdit

<ping project should not be used in an indented reply> Ash Crow
Dereckson
Harmonia Amanda
Hsarrazin
Jura
Чаховіч Уладзіслаў
Sascha
Joxemai
Place Clichy
Branthecan
Azertus
ToJack
Jon Harald Søby
PKM
Pmt
Sight Contamination
MaksOttoVonStirlitz
BeatrixBelibaste
Moebeus
Dcflyer
Looniverse
Aya Reyad
Infovarius
Tris T7
Klaas van Buiten
Deborahjay
Bruno Biondi
Tokyo Akademia
ZI Jony
Laddo
Da Dapper Don
Data Gamer
Franzsimon
Arturo2R
Luca favorido
The Sir of Data Analytics
Skim
E4024
  Notified participants of WikiProject Names

Provides a simple way to link the two items together. Inverse property label for family name identical to this given name (P1533). HarryNº2 (talk) 01:59, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

DiscussionEdit

  •   Support --HarryNº2 (talk) 01:59, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Support Klaas `Z4␟` V:  08:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
  •   Comment Inverse properties are generally unnecessary here in Wikidata. Are you intending this as a true inverse, or simply for cases where a particular name is unusual as a given name, but more common as a family name? ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:54, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
What difference does that make? At the moment I don't see any possibility of referring to an identical given name. With this property there would be an easy possibility, especially in the field of personal names. --HarryNº2 (talk) 02:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Why do you need the link in that direction, if it already exists in the reverse direction? ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)