Wikidata:Property proposal/lila linked latin uri

Description	the uri of this lexeme defined by LiLa Linking Latin (Q113217752) project
Data type	External identifier
Domain	lexeme
Allowed values	lemma/[0-9]+ or hypolemma/[0-9]+
Example 1	acerra (L255022) → `lemma/87194`
Example 2	sartago (L284087) → `lemma/123456`
Example 3	abditus (L254596) → `hypolemma/30`
Source	http://lila-erc.eu/data/
Expected completeness	eventually complete (Q21873974)
Formatter URL	http://lila-erc.eu/data/id/$1

The LiLa Lemma Bank is a collection of approximately 200,000 canonical forms for Latin that is used to interlink the linguistic resources in the LiLa Knowledge Base, published as Linked Open Data by CIRCSE (Q89883181). --DL2204 10:17, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support much needed! @DL2204: do you plan to use a bot or tool to populate this property? Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 11:29, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment @VIGNERON: Yes, we plan to use WBI 12.0 for writing LiLa ID to existing Lexemes, and for creating new Latin lexemes. After this alignment on lemma-pos level, we would want to discuss what else we can use from LiLa databases for enriching WD Latin lexemes. DL2204 02:00, 25. July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment btw, @DL2204: I had a deeper look and the first example seems off. https://lila-erc.eu/data/id/lemma/1 is a proper noun (a nickname? Acerra?) and apparently not L255022 (?). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 18:07, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment @VIGNERON: you are right! https://lila-erc.eu/data/id/lemma/87194 (the common noun) is the right LiLa lemma for L255022. In our workflow, we flag cases like this for manual revision, so this mistake won't happen in production. Francescomambrini 09:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 03:58, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Middle river exports (talk) 03:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done @DL2204, VIGNERON, Middle river exports: --Tinker Bell ★ ♥ 00:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]