Wikidata:Property proposal/login/signup page
login page edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Computing
Description | webpage used to log into a service |
---|---|
Represents | login page (Q2139769) |
Data type | URL |
Domain | website (Q35127), online service (Q19967801), organization (Q43229), video game (Q7889) |
Example 1 | Google Search (Q9366)login/signup pagehttps://accounts.google.com/signin |
Example 2 | TikTok (Q48938223)login/signup pagehttps://www.tiktok.com/login |
Example 3 | Minecraft (Q49740)login/signup pagehttps://www.minecraft.net/login |
Example 4 | Internal Revenue Service (Q973587)login/signup pagehttps://sa.www4.irs.gov/eauth/pub/login.jsp |
Planned use | large scale addition of property to online services |
See also | official website (P856) |
Wikidata project | WikiProject Websites (Q15831464) |
registration page edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Computing
Description | webpage used to sign up for a service |
---|---|
Represents | registration page (Q116762009) |
Data type | URL |
Domain | website (Q35127), online service (Q19967801), organization (Q43229), video game (Q7889) |
Example 1 | Google Search (Q9366)login/signup pagehttps://accounts.google.com/signup |
Example 2 | English Wikipedia (Q328)login/signup pagehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CreateAccount |
Example 3 | Internal Revenue Service (Q973587)login/signup pagehttps://api.id.me/en/registration/new |
Planned use | large scale addition of property to online services |
See also | official website (P856) |
Wikidata project | WikiProject Websites (Q15831464) |
Motivation edit
This will further expand our coverage of websites. Helpful information to include. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 22:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Discussion edit
- Comment what are the delimitations of what sorts of pages would be in / not in scope for this property? For example, would https://4chan.org/pass count? Arlo Barnes (talk) 22:41, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Probably not that page as it looks like the purchase page, but https://sys.4chan.org/auth I would say yes. This would be the scope:
- Webpage to authenticate the user's existing account to access features.
- Webpage to create a new account on the service.
- -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 22:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Probably not that page as it looks like the purchase page, but https://sys.4chan.org/auth I would say yes. This would be the scope:
- Support. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 23:01, 11 February 2023 (UTC).
- Support Laftp0 (talk) 03:07, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- Question regarding scope of modeling: Based on the examples I’m assuming this is geared toward
• human website users. But wouldn’t it be perhaps even more helpful to have this information as relevant for bots, since for humans the login/signup page is usually just one click away from the landing/home page, whereas bots might have difficulties identifying the relevant links? And if we are thinking about bots, how are we modeling API endpoints more generally?
• websites with in-page login forms. What about websites that support or require authentication via client certificate, Kerberos, HTTP Basic authentication and similar? ―BlaueBlüte (talk) 01:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)- We could greatly expand our coverage of API endpoints, but right now we don't model them very much. This goes in line with the other URL properties. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 03:59, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Question regarding modeling choices: What is the advantage of using qualifiers to distinguish between signup and login pages, as compared to using two distingt properties, one for ‘signup page’ and one for ‘login page’? ―BlaueBlüte (talk) 01:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- They are very similar, and both logging in and signing up can be at the same URL. If others think we need two separate ones I'd be okay with that, but it seems unnecessary. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 03:56, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- Weak support I’d more strongly support splitting this into two properties for signup and login respectively. ―BlaueBlüte (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Does anyone else agree? I can do that. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 20:41, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Horcrux (talk) 11:44, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- Does anyone else agree? I can do that. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 20:41, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support. This sounds like a sensible extension of our existing coverage of websites. However, as mentioned directly above, it seems most logical to have two properties to cover this, which would make it simple to find the specific page you need and avoids the clunky wording of "login/signup". BEANS X2 (talk) 10:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- I also support creating two properties. If the login page is the same as sign up page, then they simply have the same value. Midleading (talk) 02:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- I split the property into two based on feedback. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 16:26, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Arlo Barnes, BEANS X2, BlaueBlüte, Horcrux, Laftp0, Mahir256: @Midleading, Nomen ad hoc, Tinker Bell, Wd-Ryan: login URL (P11903) and registration page URL (P11904) Done. Good contributions, Ederporto (talk) 09:30, 21 July 2023 (UTC)