Wikidata:Property proposal/member
member edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Organization
Not done
Description | Member of a specific organization (if enumerable; otherwise only important ones, but other property is preferred) |
---|---|
Data type | Item |
Example 1 | European Union (Q458) → 27 items (preferred rank); United Kingdom (Q145) (normal rank with qualifier) |
Example 2 | United Nations Security Council (Q37470) → 133 items with 15 preferred ranks |
Example 3 | Star Alliance (Q189709) → 38 items with 26 preferred ranks |
See also | Property:P100 (deleted); member of political party (P102), member of (P463), position held (P39), significant person (P3342); excluding (P1011), including (P1012); object has role (P3831) |
Motivation edit
In Wikidata:Project_chat#Brexit_in_Wikidata, it is found not easy to query current members of EU. In addition, it will be possible to receive all members in only one item, where Lua can't handle inverse property relationships, and it is expensive to access a large number of items.
Note: This proposal intended to restore a deleted property, not to create a new one.GZWDer (talk) 09:47, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Discussion edit
- It's unclear to me how that helps with the usecase of providing an easy way to query that member of (P463) doesn't provide. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 13:41, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose No need for inverse property here. ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:44, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Not yet another inverse property which nobody will take care of, please. If inverse lookups are needed for Lua then one should rather demand an extension of the Scribunto-library in Phabricator. Adding a new property in my opinion feels just like a poor workaround. --Nw520 (talk) 21:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Especially problematic are organisations with many members. From my experience there are little organisations with hundreds of memberships, however there are certainly organisations with more than hundreds of members. The UI of Wikibase is already quite sluggish for countries. Now imagine trying to edit Städte- und Gemeindetag Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Q1292296) with its over ~750 members. --Nw520 (talk) 21:41, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Not done, no consensus to create --DannyS712 (talk) 18:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)