Wikidata:Property proposal/overruled by
overruled by edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Organization
Not done
Description | case that supersedes another case |
---|---|
Data type | Item |
Template parameter | "Overruled" in en:template:Infobox SCOTUS case |
Domain | court cases |
Example | Plessy v. Ferguson (Q656660) overruled by Brown v. Board of Education (Q875738) |
Planned use | modeling of United States Supreme Court cases and others |
See also | Wikidata:Property proposal/overrules |
- Motivation
Needed to model the relationship between court cases. Phoebe (talk) 19:07, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Sounds like a great idea James F. (talk) 19:11, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support I think this is a good idea, since we have a lot of notable supreme court cases that will have this relationship with each other. Slaporte (talk) 19:13, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support Aubrey (talk) 07:00, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- Commment: I'm not convinced we need both properties. The inverse of "overrules" should be calculable. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- While it's possible to calculate the inverse, I think there enough cases where the property can be used to warrant a new property. ChristianKl (talk) 14:00, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose. Adding an inverse property for overrules (P4006) is unhelpful. --Yair rand (talk) 01:55, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Repeater for overrules (P4006) and opposite of (P461) ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:54, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
@Phoebe, Slaporte, Aubrey, Pigsonthewing, Yair rand, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2: Not done, given that the proposal is stale and didn't really get support. If in the future there's a good argument why the inverse is not enough, please create a new proposal. ChristianKl (✉) 23:20, 5 December 2017 (UTC)