Wikidata:Property proposal/repairability

Repairability Index edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic

Not done

Description	The reparability index indicates the extent to which a product can be repaired. The reparability index has been mandatory in France since January 1, 2021 when purchasing new appliances.
Represents	Repairability (Q30748592)
Data type	Number (not available yet)
Domain	item (Q56599248, Q21065099)
Allowed values	0 – 1
Example 1	iPhone XS (Q56599248) → 0.47 (https://www.indicereparabilite.fr/produit/apple-iphone-xs-a1921-2/)
Example 2	Samsung Galaxy A41 (Q97223473) → 0.8 (https://www.indicereparabilite.fr/produit/smartphone-samsung-galaxy-a41/)
Example 3	MacBook Pro 16-inch (Q78982844) → 0.63 (https://www.indicereparabilite.fr/produit/ordinateur-portable-apple-macbook-pro-16-pouces-a2141/)
Example 4	Q106612435 → 0.83 (https://www.darty.com/nav/achat/informatique/ordinateur_portable-portable/portable/lenovo_yoga_7_14itl5.html)
Source	https://www.indicereparabilite.fr/
Planned use	Create data objects for all products stated in https://www.indicereparabilite.fr and add the Repairability Index.
Applicable "stated in"-value	Repairability Index (Q105809009)

Motivation edit

The reparability index describes a product in terms of its reparability/sustainability. The index makes different products of a product category comparable. Tobias (talk) 11:39, 7 March 2021 (UTC) – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Augentier307 (talk • contribs) at 12:39, March 7, 2021‎ (UTC).[reply]

Discussion edit

I think we should name this property something more specific to that website or whoever it is that is doing the scoring. BrokenSegue (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the name should be specific about the source. ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 18:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

+1--So9q (talk) 09:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that we should make the name more specific, and that being said, if the change is made I like this property proposal. Ainali (talk)

Note I added the missing signature of the user who created this proposal (based on page history). I have no idea where the "Tobias" signature came from. ArthurPSmith (talk) 18:50, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Is the source, https://www.indicereparabilite.fr actually reliable or relevant to WikiData? JesseW (talk) 19:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - "Mandatory in France", sounds like a legal context. I'm all for "Right to Repair" efforts worldwide, however, I think it's important any proposal implying a legal context, first must show proof of a law(s). I'll help here... https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/indice-reparabilite and https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/loi-anti-gaspillage#e13 --Thadguidry (talk) 20:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment How general should this be? I'm aware that iFixit (Q984913) includes a numeric "repairability score" in many of their product teardowns, and there may be others. 73.170.147.86 00:25, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think linking to the item would be better and with a qualifier of the numeric rating Germartin1 (talk) 20:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done - no support for the proposal --DannyS712 (talk) 01:26, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]