Wikidata:Property proposal/screened at festival

screened at festival

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work

   Not done

Description	the festival where the film was screened as part of its program
Data type	Item
Domain	film (Q11424)
Allowed values	film festival (Q220505), film festival edition (Q27787439)
Example	The Shape of Water (Q26698156) → 2017 Toronto International Film Festival (Q28445236)
See also	publication date (P577), date of first performance (P1191)

Motivation

We have publication date (P577) for wide or limited releases of movies in different markets (qualified by place of publication (P291)), date of first performance (P1191) for the (red carpet) premiere event, but no practical way to indicate when a title is part of the program at a festival. To be qualified by point in time (P585) for the date of screening, location (P276) for the venue, and P???? for the section the movie was screened in (like Un Certain Regard (Q1071326) in Cannes). Máté (talk) 14:20, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Discussion

•  Support David (talk) 15:26, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
• I'd prefer the inverse property, where 2017 Cannes Film Festival (Q24204092) <inverse of this property> The Square (Q27237522), A Man of Integrity (Q29401467), A Gentle Night (Q30333309) etc. Mahir256 (talk) 22:39, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
  • @Mahir256: I gave a lot of thought to this since either approach can work. My thinking was that a) awards recipients are not collected at the award item but vice versa (although that would probably result in less duplication), b) editors are more likely to try and list festival appearences for films rather than list the programs of festivals (although this is pure speculation), c) this way when no items are available for editions of film festivals, the item for the film festival can be used (although ideally items for editions would be created). But again, either approach can work. – Máté (talk) 06:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Use significant event (P793). Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:25, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
• Not really sure about the best direction to do this. Given the potential volume, P793 seems unsuitable.
  --- Jura 09:36, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

 Not done @Máté: Use the newly created presented in (P5072).--Micru (talk) 07:58, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

@Micru: Thanks! – Máté (talk) 07:59, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

• • I think "presented in" wasn't meant for this. Or maybe I just didn't understand these two proposals.
    --- Jura 08:06, 19 April 2018 (UTC)