Wikidata:Property proposal/see also element
see also element (was see also) edit
Not done
Description | use more specific property if possible |
---|---|
Data type | Item |
Example | patron of the arts (Q15472169) → art patronage (Q214092) alternative medicine (Q188504) → traditional medicine (Q771035) |
- Motivation
Customary last resort internal link tool. -- Abc82 (talk) 12:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Discussion
A few years ago this proposal was not supported in Wikidata:Wiktionary project context, discussion did not take place. -- Abc82 (talk) 12:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Since related property (P1659) already exists this would require either a new name for your proposal here, or using the existing property but allowing it to be applied to items as well as properties. ArthurPSmith (talk) 14:07, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Renamed. Proposed name is precised as see also item. When related property (P1659) will less frequently used, it can be renamed to see also property giving short name to the proposed property. When item+property tagged union (Q7675229) data type will available, they can be merged as see also. -- Abc82 (talk) 06:50, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support I could have used this from time to time. --Srittau (talk) 09:29, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose -- this is a previously rejected proposal. If you have a need to link something, find the actual relation between the two items and propose that relation. --Izno (talk) 13:17, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose this is somehow the opposite of structured data. --Pasleim (talk) 21:16, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose boundaries of use of this property are not well defined. Lymantria (talk) 14:57, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
@Abc82: Not done, no consensus (unfortunately). --Srittau (talk) 22:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)