Wikidata:Property proposal/skyscanner hotel ID
skyscanner hotel ID edit
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Organization
| Description | skyscanner hotel ID |
|---|---|
| Data type | External identifier |
| Example 1 | d'primahotel Petitenget Seminyak (Q110903311) → 134620184 |
| Example 2 | Melia Bali Villas & Spa (Q110774995) → 131947552 |
| Example 3 | Kempinski Hotel Corvinus, Budapest (Q1106716) → 46980258 |
| Formatter URL | https://www.skyscanner.co.id/hotels/_/_/_/ht-$1 |
Motivation edit
(Add your motivation for this property here.) Germartin1 (talk) 06:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Discussion edit
Leaning oppose Since Skyscanner is only an aggregator, there are no hotels that can't be identified with other IDs like Booking.com hotel ID (P3607) or TripAdvisor ID (P3134). I don't see much value in adding every hotel platform of the world, when there's no special inventory or dataset. --Newt713 (talk) 14:30, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Newt713: I do have a dataset, and the advantage of Skyscanner is that it links to Agoda, Booking and Trip.com, which can be added automatically. Germartin1 (talk) 15:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- But is there an added value, when it can be added automatically? Does it help to identify an organization/hotel or to be used as a reference? --Newt713 (talk) 16:34, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Newt713: Yes it will be used to help identify hotels and I also want to use it as a reference. Germartin1 (talk) 02:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Newt713: any other question? Germartin1 (talk) 09:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- No, thank you. I still don't see a need for those aggregated IDs, but if you need it to work with it, I would not oppose. Best --Newt713 (talk) 09:40, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks, the prop would still help me for querying, matching and as a reference. Germartin1 (talk) 12:01, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- No, thank you. I still don't see a need for those aggregated IDs, but if you need it to work with it, I would not oppose. Best --Newt713 (talk) 09:40, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Newt713: any other question? Germartin1 (talk) 09:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Newt713: Yes it will be used to help identify hotels and I also want to use it as a reference. Germartin1 (talk) 02:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- But is there an added value, when it can be added automatically? Does it help to identify an organization/hotel or to be used as a reference? --Newt713 (talk) 16:34, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Newt713: I do have a dataset, and the advantage of Skyscanner is that it links to Agoda, Booking and Trip.com, which can be added automatically. Germartin1 (talk) 15:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Support Orlandata (talk) 11:27, 4 March 2022 (UTC)- Support Nepalicoi (talk) 08:21, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support—MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 06:37, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Germartin1, Orlandata, Nepalicoi, MasterRus21thCentury:
Done: Skyscanner hotel ID (P10487). Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 17:56, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
