Wikidata:Property proposal/version to be deposited

version to be deposited edit

Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Creative work

   Withdrawn
Descriptionversion of the works in the scope of the policy
Data typeItem
Domainopen access policy (Q2000006)
Allowed valuespreprint (Q580922), postprint (Q2106255), published version
ExampleAalborg University open access policy (Q41868837) -> postprint (Q2106255)
SourceRegistry of Open Access Repositories Mandates and Policies (Q7277308)
Planned useimporting ROARMAP
Motivation

I suspect this could be done with existing properties, so this is more of a request for advice than a real proposal. If we really need a new property, it could be better to broaden the scope of this one (generalizing it to other types of policies? to other aspects of OA policies? suggestions welcome!).

Daniel Mietchen
Ainali
DarTar
PKM
Marchitelli
Lawsonstu
Nasir Khan Saikat
HLHJ
Pintoch
Sic19
Jsamwrites
Ptolusque
Netha
Oa01 (talk) 18:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Mlemusrojas (talk) 3:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Jaireeodell (talk) 15:07, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 12:42, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Megs
D.C.flyer
Ivanhercaz (Talk) 11:09, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Mazuritz (talk) 11:14, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Wallacegromit1 (talk) 08:55, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Matlin (talk) 09:42, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So9q (talk) 19:11, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Vis M (talk) 22:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Zblace (talk) 10:41, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
spida-tarbell (talk) 21:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Maxime
Metacladistics (talk) 13:25, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Notified participants of WikiProject Open Access

Pintoch (talk) 10:35, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion
  Support John Samuel 17:22, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jsamwrites: Thanks! You might want to move your vote to this new version of the proposal. − Pintoch (talk) 12:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment I think some new property is needed to express this, but I'd suggest something more general. For example, how about a property "mandates" or "requires", to indicate what a given policy or law requires, and then for this case the value would be open access (Q232932) with qualifier applies to part (P518) preprint (Q580922) etc. ArthurPSmith (talk)
That's exactly the sort of generalization I was looking for, thanks! Should I open a new proposal or can we reuse this one? − Pintoch (talk) 18:16, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Pintoch: Probably best to withdraw this and create a new one from scratch, but you can reference this discussion. ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:55, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]