Wikidata:Property proposal/ww2.org ID
ww2.org ID
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
Not done
| Description | Topic ID in ww2.org |
|---|---|
| Data type | External identifier |
| Example 1 | Second Battle of El Alamein (Q153376) → El Alamein (Battle) |
| Example 2 | Category:1939 (Q5866740) → Category:1939 |
| Example 3 | MISSING |
| Source | http://ww2.org/index.php?title=Main_Page |
| Number of IDs in source | http://ww2.org/index.php?title=Special:Statistics |
| Formatter URL | http://ww2.org/index.php?title=$1 |
| See also |
التحفيز
Useful information about World War II (Q362) David (talk) 10:26, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Discussion
Comment There are a lot of WWII history websites; this is a mediawiki site, so a sister in a sense, but can you give a bit more detail on why you think this one is important or special? ArthurPSmith (talk) 19:46, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- That was my thought, too. How reliable is this site? Unfortunately, these kind of sites often seem to attract the kind of people who aren't satisfied with information provided by historians and try to spread their own version of the "truth" (revisionists, apologists, misled Wehraboos...), so it's important that there is some kind of review and quality control. But I can't find any hint that there are historians involved or that there is some kind of review of the content by experts. Looking through the wiki, there seem to be many pages that are pretty empty, others were obviously imported from some other wiki (edit comments, missing templates, etc.). And their Recent Changes page doesn't show a lot of activity. Doesn't look like a high quality source of information to me. --Kam Solusar (talk) 01:28, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Oppose ww2.org is no scientific resource -- JakobVoss (talk) 06:44, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2, ArthurPSmith, Kam Solusar, JakobVoss: 
Not done, open for more than three months with no support. Thanks anyway! --abián 13:35, 7 December 2018 (UTC)