Wikidata:Requests for comment/Items for user pages
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- I'm closing this early because there have been no new arguments provided since the past discussions that covered this: 1, 2, and more I couldn't find. Legoktm (talk) 03:58, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
| An editor has requested the community to provide input on "Items for user pages" via the Requests for comment (RFC) process. This is the discussion page regarding the issue.
If you have an opinion regarding this issue, feel free to comment below. Thank you! |
THIS RFC IS CLOSED. Please do NOT vote nor add comments.
Starting this topic, creating the item for the user pages of all Wikipedias. if can, to be created item, the categories, articles, templates, which would then be created items for user pages. I want to first of all, the community say about it, and to express their opinion. --Kolega2357 (talk) 20:00, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Voting edit
Yes edit
Support --Kolega2357 (talk) 19:11, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
No edit
Oppose for the same reasons why I previously opposed the inclusion of userpages. Wikidata is a knowledgebase, to centralize information, not act as a mere interwiki repository. I don't like how this was proposed only a month after the previous discussion on this.--Jasper Deng (talk) 18:46, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- To give the proposer some credit, the issue was brought to project chat (presumably because he did not see the previous RFC) and told to start a new one if he wanted to change the prior consensus. --Izno (talk) 03:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose, per my own comments below and previous discussion on the matter. --Izno (talk) 03:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Discussion edit
- There has already been an RFC that covered this and I don't see that the initiator of this RFC has offered any new arguments. So what is the point? Silver hr (talk) 21:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- It's not fair to be everything else be like on Wikidata except user page. Much better it could then more interwiki bots would not have the function. --Kolega2357 (talk) 22:04, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- I don't see how this is a question of fairness. Wikidata exists to create a database of knowledge, not to document the users (editors) of the Wikimedia websites. --Izno (talk) 03:25, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
- It's not fair to be everything else be like on Wikidata except user page. Much better it could then more interwiki bots would not have the function. --Kolega2357 (talk) 22:04, 22 April 2013 (UTC)