Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2018/07/14
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Isaac Walton Taber (Q55504872): American illustrator: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Duplicate of Q52155580 --West32 (talk) 23:35, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Done Redirect created by Matěj Suchánek, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:50, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Q22926172: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No such disambiguation page Innotata (talk) 05:04, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 07:50, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Q3886502: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted disambiguation page --Mauro Tozzi (talk) 07:38, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 07:50, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Canal d'Aragó i Catalunya (Q11911903): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Item duplicate Q24003657 --Srnais (talk) 08:10, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Q55519242: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Vandalism Wargo (talk) 09:25, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:40, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Q55519242: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Cross-wiki vandalism --Tegel (talk) 09:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Deleted by Matěj Suchánek (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 09:40, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Q6007537: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Does not meet the notability policy Kostas20142 (talk) 11:37, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Q55521645: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Cross-wiki vandalism. See Q55519242 --Tegel (talk) 13:07, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
More items about Wikimedians
Q28608893
Q28608893: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable person Bodhisattwa (talk) 21:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Q28469412
Subhashish Panigrahi (Q28469412): Wikimedian, author: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable person, self-created item with no serious references, self-published authority control Bodhisattwa (talk) 21:28, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Q46108408
Nurunnaby Chowdhury (Hasive) (Q46108408): Bangladeshi author, journalist, columnist, and researcher: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable person, self-created item with no seious reference, self-created authority control Bodhisattwa (talk) 21:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Q47513628
Nasir Khan Saikat (Q47513628): Bangladeshi writer, journalist, photographer, designer, software engineer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Self-created item with no serious references, self-published external identifiers Bodhisattwa (talk) 21:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Combined discussion
- @Bodhisattwa: See this discussion. I am tempted to keep it with a similar rationale to what @MisterSynergy: used back in September. Mahir256 (talk) 21:14, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Mahir256:, Thanks for the link, but I think, @Jarekt: has stronger point. The person here has created his own item, has no references to prove his claims, has no wikilinks, has no non-self-published authority controls. Being a Wikimedian and a student is not the criteria for notability, I guess. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 21:27, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Bodhisattwa: (I have combined these requests as they are likely to share a common resolution.) The second and third points of WD:N seem to suggest (not together for any one item) that these items be kept, but let's see what @Prateek Pattanaik, Psubhashish, Hasive: think. Also @Jarekt: if his opinion has changed in the last ten months. Mahir256 (talk) 21:44, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Also @Nasirkhan: (there was an edit conflict so I forgot to add him in the ping with the other three above). Mahir256 (talk) 21:45, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Mahir256:, the Wikimedians created their own data and surprisingly, they are now asked for what they think about the deletion requests of their items. This would be a conflict of interest (Q211067), don't you think? -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 21:56, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Bodhisattwa: No admin is required to follow the wishes of an item's creator. The pings I have made are only the same sort of courtesy as what I extend on behalf of those who nominate other items here but (forget to? don't?) inform their creators that they have done so. You can see that Saileshpat in the September discussion, for example, did not mind the deletion of the item about himself, and @יונה בנדלאק: could have decided to delete it even if Saileshpat wanted it kept. We should thus allow for the possibility that any of the other four here think like you and (Jarek?) do. Mahir256 (talk) 22:10, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Mahir256:, thanks for the clarification. I didnt engage with the item-creators about the deletion requests because that goes directly with conflict of interest (Q211067). Anyway, in the September 2017 discussion, one of the reason for which the items were kept is presence of Commons Creator page (P1472), but it can be noticed that the Commons Creator page has also been created by the item-creator himself, which again goes with the point of self-creation of data. So, the item-creators have created items about themselves, with no wikilinks and no references, and all the external identifiers and the commons creator pages were also created by themselves. I dont think criteria 2 and 3 of notability guideline apply here. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 22:34, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Bodhisattwa: No admin is required to follow the wishes of an item's creator. The pings I have made are only the same sort of courtesy as what I extend on behalf of those who nominate other items here but (forget to? don't?) inform their creators that they have done so. You can see that Saileshpat in the September discussion, for example, did not mind the deletion of the item about himself, and @יונה בנדלאק: could have decided to delete it even if Saileshpat wanted it kept. We should thus allow for the possibility that any of the other four here think like you and (Jarek?) do. Mahir256 (talk) 22:10, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Mahir256:, the Wikimedians created their own data and surprisingly, they are now asked for what they think about the deletion requests of their items. This would be a conflict of interest (Q211067), don't you think? -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 21:56, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
- Technically, the items meet criterion 1) It contains at least one valid sitelink. Ghouston (talk) 06:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Mahir256:, Thanks for the link, but I think, @Jarekt: has stronger point. The person here has created his own item, has no references to prove his claims, has no wikilinks, has no non-self-published authority controls. Being a Wikimedian and a student is not the criteria for notability, I guess. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 21:27, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Done @Bodhisattwa, Jarekt: It appears Maarten has already deleted these items for lack of notability. @Nasirkhan, Hasive, Psubhashish, Prateek Pattanaik: please direct all complaints to Maarten's talk page. Mahir256 (talk) 22:36, 14 July 2018 (UTC)