Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2019/01/13
|
This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion. |
Balatonakarattya (Q2175959): municipality of Hungary: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Will remain double after the wrong name --Palotabarát (talk) 22:38, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Done Redirect created by User:Tacsipacsi, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Liber factory (Q60560628): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Duplucate of Q6638583 --Gveret Tered (talk) 09:33, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:Tacsipacsi, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Nuria Oliver (Q60581463): Spanish computer scientist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Duplicate of Q18720176 --Lunapruna (talk) 16:57, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Done Redirect created by User:Tacsipacsi, you can do it yourself next time. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:20, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q60569088: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Near empty item, insufficient context to warrant an item. Hiàn (talk) 03:10, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- that is the name for this symbol § - it should most likely be merged with Q1136371 Lazypub (talk)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q60550128: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam, out of scope. Hiàn (talk) 03:17, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
invalid ID (L41003): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not a lexeme --KaMan (talk) 06:39, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q59506703: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
En.wp article is a redirect and content is nonsense Slomox (talk) 10:56, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete - it is a relatively new item with one edit, and the creator was blocked on en.wikipedia that same day for vandalism. It is not worth a merge. Lazypub (talk)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q32996454: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Item about category on mlwiki which has been deleted for error in spelling and being empty --Razimantv (talk) 11:30, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q10730328: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted elsewhere Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:00, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q60576029: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Accidental creation Andrew Gray (talk) 12:58, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q56372232: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty and useless, disambig between two merged pages NickK (talk) 15:31, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q60578298: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Does not meet notability criteria Esteban16 (talk) 16:52, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q60563271: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Does not meet notability criteria/Spam Esteban16 (talk) 16:53, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q60552850: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Does not meet notability criteria Esteban16 (talk) 16:53, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q60575121: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Empty Hedwig in Washington (talk) 20:19, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q60537359: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Doesn't meet the notability criteria. No sitelinks, internal links, external IDs (except Twitter account) or references. Kam Solusar (talk) 20:36, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q58974561: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
No evidence of notability. No internal links, no authority control. The only sitelink has been deleted as non-notable. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 00:15, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q28022518: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Page at pt.wiki has been deleted because it does not meet the criteria for disambiguation pages. --Francisco (talk) 00:32, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q9728402: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted on mywiki Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 03:02, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q9704516: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted on mywiki Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 03:02, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q17769118: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted on srwikinews, empty item Zoranzoki21 (talk) 04:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q9512761: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Deleted category Paucabot (talk) 06:31, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)- Deleted by MisterSynergy (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 06:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Bulk deletion request
- Q60551838 (delete | history | links | logs)
- Q60574653 (delete | history | links | logs)
- Q60575434 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)
Empty David (talk) 08:13, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted. Bencemac (talk) 17:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Graphemes in Lexemes
invalid ID (L20694): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Lexemes concerned: invalid ID (L20694), invalid ID (L20696), invalid ID (L20701), invalid ID (L20704), invalid ID (L28591), invalid ID (L28704), invalid ID (L20692), invalid ID (L20693), invalid ID (L20695), invalid ID (L20697), invalid ID (L20698), invalid ID (L20699), invalid ID (L20700), invalid ID (L20702), invalid ID (L20703), invalid ID (L20705), invalid ID (L20706), invalid ID (L28589), invalid ID (L28590), invalid ID (L28592), invalid ID (L28593), invalid ID (L28594), invalid ID (L28595), invalid ID (L28596), invalid ID (L28597), invalid ID (L28598), invalid ID (L28702), invalid ID (L28703), invalid ID (L28705).
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 13:15, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Support KaMan (talk) 13:29, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Oppose within the Wikibase datamodel, L-namespace is better suited for the content than item namespace. --- Jura 13:34, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Lexeme namespaces is for lexemes. Graphemes are not lexemes. KaMan (talk) 14:50, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- L-namespace isn't limited to lexemes in the linguistic sense. It has special features designed for lexicographic data, making it perfectly suitable for French graphemes. Just try to reproduce the same on an item instead, to learn how useful these features are. --- Jura 14:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Can you point me exact page where it is stated Lexeme namespace is for storing something more than lexemes? I looked into Wikidata:Lexicographical data and it is saying "words, phrases and sentences". Graphemes are not words, phrases and sentences. KaMan (talk) 15:38, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Feel free to update project documentation where/if needed. --- Jura 15:42, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- That's you who states Lexeme namespaces should contain graphemes. Before adding them to lexeme namespace you should ask (and get consensus) if current definition can be extended to contain graphemes. I'm fine with current definition of lexemes in lexemes namespace. KaMan (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- It would be suboptimal to add this within the software source or somewhere else. Lexeme namespace isn't explicitly limited to lexemes as defined by Polish print dictionaries. --- Jura 09:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- L-namespace isn't limited to lexemes in the linguistic sense. It has special features designed for lexicographic data, making it perfectly suitable for French graphemes. Just try to reproduce the same on an item instead, to learn how useful these features are. --- Jura 14:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Lexeme namespaces is for lexemes. Graphemes are not lexemes. KaMan (talk) 14:50, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support No consensus and AFAIK no reason to add graphemes as entities in Lexeme namespace.--Shlomo (talk) 16:45, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support This should really be a within-software source codes rather than a single Lexeme entry, and their translations should be handled by translatewiki.net not just on-wiki. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:41, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support Agreed with what has been said before. Pamputt (talk) 09:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
{{Done}} --Pasleim (talk) 16:31, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Can someone undelete these so people have time to review/comment/keep or migrate them to item namespace? --- Jura 16:36, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Pasleim: FYI ↑. Bencemac (talk) 08:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- To comment, the title of the section provides enough information. To migrate, many lists with all French grahemes can be found online. --Pasleim (talk) 17:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- This is not the way deletion discussion usually work. Entities are discussed first, then evaluated. There is no reason to speedily delete this prior to hardly an active contributor in the field participating. Looks like another arbitrary administrative action by Pasleim, especially as deletion request for agreed problematic items stay here for months. --- Jura 08:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- To comment, the title of the section provides enough information. To migrate, many lists with all French grahemes can be found online. --Pasleim (talk) 17:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
@Jura1: Do you expect more comments or can we archive it? --Pasleim (talk) 10:54, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- Done. Let's archive. Bencemac (talk) 17:44, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q58304689: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Non-notable mobile game. Linked articles have already been deleted. Hiàn (talk) 03:48, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:50, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deleted by Bencemac (talk • contribs • logs) --DeltaBot (talk) 17:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q26903671 and Q26903658
- Q26903671: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
- Q26903658: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Spam/advertising; the items mutually link each other, but there are no serious sources for any of the content provided. en:CybrHome was deleted as spam in October 2016. —MisterSynergy (talk) 07:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted. Bencemac (talk) 17:41, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q60062040: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Unclear notability. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 11:05, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q60548817: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Promotional item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
B (L4624): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Not an acronym --- Jura 12:27, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Comment the instance of (P31) could be changed but it's probably better to start a new entity, so: weak. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 12:56, 29 December 2018 (UTC) Delete- You are kidding, 93 meanings in https://www.acronymfinder.com/B.html
Keep. KaMan (talk) 14:56, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Copying some other website isn't helpful. If you need a definition of "acronym" in English, try w:acronym. --- Jura 15:01, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Who is saying about copying? I only provide source url against original "Not an acronym" statement. B is an acronym. KaMan (talk) 15:33, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- An url isn't a definition. w:acronym has one, quite prominently. And acronym (Q101244) is about the concept, not about the namespace definition of some other website. --- Jura 15:45, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Who is saying url is a definition? You are reading different things I write. I don't have problem with w:acronym, B fits it. KaMan (talk) 15:59, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- @KaMan, Jura1: well, it's unclear if an acronym can be one-letter long or not (like if an acronym should be "pronouncable" or not), that is why I suggested to changed it (to initialism (Q918270) or abbreviation (Q102786)). I think we should put this deletion On hold and discuss it on Wikidata talk:Lexicographical data. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 20:58, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- We did and the main argument for it being an acronym in English is that a reference lists it as such in Polish: Wikidata_talk:Lexicographical_data/Archive/2018/11#(in_English)_Is_"B"_an_acronym,_a_letter,_a_grapheme,_a_noun,_or_all_four?. Other than the domain name of the website listing all abbreviations, do we have an actual reference for the claim? --- Jura 08:11, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Given that discussion (that you should have shared when creating this request), I'm now leaning to a weak Keep. VIGNERON (talk) 09:54, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Given that discussion (that you should have shared when creating this request), I'm now leaning to a weak
- We did and the main argument for it being an acronym in English is that a reference lists it as such in Polish: Wikidata_talk:Lexicographical_data/Archive/2018/11#(in_English)_Is_"B"_an_acronym,_a_letter,_a_grapheme,_a_noun,_or_all_four?. Other than the domain name of the website listing all abbreviations, do we have an actual reference for the claim? --- Jura 08:11, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- @KaMan, Jura1: well, it's unclear if an acronym can be one-letter long or not (like if an acronym should be "pronouncable" or not), that is why I suggested to changed it (to initialism (Q918270) or abbreviation (Q102786)). I think we should put this deletion
- Who is saying url is a definition? You are reading different things I write. I don't have problem with w:acronym, B fits it. KaMan (talk) 15:59, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- An url isn't a definition. w:acronym has one, quite prominently. And acronym (Q101244) is about the concept, not about the namespace definition of some other website. --- Jura 15:45, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Who is saying about copying? I only provide source url against original "Not an acronym" statement. B is an acronym. KaMan (talk) 15:33, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Copying some other website isn't helpful. If you need a definition of "acronym" in English, try w:acronym. --- Jura 15:01, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Not done no consensus for deletion. --Pasleim (talk) 21:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Walter Ziffer (Q10839518): American author and engineer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q60595496 --Marko B. Faber (talk) 19:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Done merged with Q60595496. --Pasleim (talk) 21:45, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Q60536626: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
Doesn't meet the notability criteria. No sitelinks, internal links, external IDs or references. Kam Solusar (talk) 19:43, 13 January 2019 (UTC)