Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/AitalDisem
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Not done @Aitalvivem: This request seems to be abandoned, please reopen it if that is not the case. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
AitalDisem edit
AitalDisem (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Operator: Aitalvivem (talk • contribs • logs)
Task/s: This bot is made to create a sens (with an item) for every occitan lexeme in wikidata. This is the direct continuation of AitalvivemBot. This is a web application presented as a game. The program will get (for each lexeme) its french translation from Lo Congres's data (unfortunately those are privates data so we can't insert them in wikidata) and look for every item having the occitan word or translation in its label. Then it will use the collaborative work of the community to select the good senses and, once validated, insert them in wikidata. This program has the same goal than Michael Schoenitzer's MachtSinn but uses a translation database. I am also trying to make this program simple to adapt for other languages and with a complete documentation.
Code: You can find my code and documentation here
Function details: It would be very long to list every functions of this program (you can find it in the documentation here and here) but overall this bot will :
- get informations about lexeme, senses and items
- create senses
- add items to senses using Property:P5137
The program will also verify to have enough positive responses from users before inserting a sens. All the details about the process of a game, the test of reliability of an user and the verification before inserting a sens are in the documentation.
--Aitalvivem (talk) 15:48, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support This seems like a nice approach to collaborative translation. ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you provide some test edits (say 50-100)? Lymantria (talk) 10:30, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Lymantria: Hi, I did two test run on 30 lexemes, for each lexeme I did two edits : one to add a sens and the other to add an Item to this sens.
- Here is the list of the lexemes : Lexeme:L41768, Lexeme:L44861, Lexeme:L57835, Lexeme:L57921, Lexeme:L235215, Lexeme:L235216, Lexeme:L235217, Lexeme:L235219, Lexeme:L235221, Lexeme:L235222, Lexeme:L235223, Lexeme:L235225, Lexeme:L235226, Lexeme:L235227, Lexeme:L235228, Lexeme:L235229, Lexeme:L235231, Lexeme:L235232, Lexeme:L235234, Lexeme:L235235, Lexeme:L235236, Lexeme:L235239, Lexeme:L235240, Lexeme:L235242, Lexeme:L235243, Lexeme:L235244, Lexeme:L235245, Lexeme:L235246, Lexeme:L235247, Lexeme:L235248
- The first test failed because of a stupid mistake of mine in the configuration file of the program. For the second test I had a problem when adding the item for Lexeme:L235226 because there were quotations marks in the description of the item so I fixed the probelem, run it again and everything went well.--Aitalvivem (talk) 10:11, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I take it the test edits are the ones by the IP? Lymantria (talk) 08:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I used the bot account to connect to the api but I don't know why it prints the IP instead of the bots account--Aitalvivem (talk) 09:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I would like to see you succeed to do so. Lymantria (talk) 12:57, 26 January 2020 (UTC) (@Aitalvivem: 07:02, 29 January 2020 (UTC))[reply]
- @Aitalvivem: Any progress? Lymantria (talk) 08:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aitalvivem: Seems like there hasn't been any progress on this? Hazard-SJ (talk) 06:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aitalvivem: Any progress? Lymantria (talk) 08:34, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I would like to see you succeed to do so. Lymantria (talk) 12:57, 26 January 2020 (UTC) (@Aitalvivem: 07:02, 29 January 2020 (UTC))[reply]
- Yes, I used the bot account to connect to the api but I don't know why it prints the IP instead of the bots account--Aitalvivem (talk) 09:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I take it the test edits are the ones by the IP? Lymantria (talk) 08:31, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The first test failed because of a stupid mistake of mine in the configuration file of the program. For the second test I had a problem when adding the item for Lexeme:L235226 because there were quotations marks in the description of the item so I fixed the probelem, run it again and everything went well.--Aitalvivem (talk) 10:11, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note for closing bureaucrats: IPBE granted for 6 months per Special:Permalink/1102840151#IP blocked; please switch to permanent IPBE when you approve it. (Or the bot master should consider using Wikimedia Cloud Services where you don't get any IP blocks and a server env for use.) — regards, Revi 14:14, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]