Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/JAnDbot
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Approved, please lower the amount of time in which you load pages and create them to avoid duplicates. Legoktm (talk) 15:13, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
JAnDbot edit
JAnDbot (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Operator: JAn Dudík (talk • contribs • logs)
Task/s:
- Interwiki using Reza1615's script
- Importing labels, descriptions, statements and in future other data too
Function details: Bot is started from cswiki and work from small wikis including hsb and dsb too. --JAn Dudík (talk) 19:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support looks good--Stevenliuyi (talk) 18:36, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support known script Vogone talk 00:59, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No support until the bugs are fixed. Furthermore, I am not really convinced by a 21,000 edit trial, especially, since your bot was already blocked a while ago for unapproved edits. Regards, Vogone talk 17:20, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Which bugs? there is only one duplicate caused by combination of "edit conflict"
and temporary loss of connection. JAn Dudík (talk) 18:59, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Which bugs? there is only one duplicate caused by combination of "edit conflict"
- No support until the bugs are fixed. Furthermore, I am not really convinced by a 21,000 edit trial, especially, since your bot was already blocked a while ago for unapproved edits. Regards, Vogone talk 17:20, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Amir (talk) 11:24, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The bot will be approved in 24h unless there are no objections.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:31, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I temporarily blocked the bot for going way over it's trial limit (21k???) and for creating duplicates: Q9239553 was created by my bot at 8:44, then JAnDbot created Q9240383 at 8:57. Legoktm (talk) 09:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- So if there is nobody who is able to grant flag, cs.wiki will be month after launching Wikidata without interwiki bot? This request is here for more than week.
- The only problem is sole duplicate, which was created by Legobot between my bot loads bunch of pages and created them - I migth decrease the amount of pages in one load.
- JAn Dudík (talk) 13:21, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I hope this will fix it. Regards, Vogone talk 15:12, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In that time I have lost my internet connection for a while, so the time of conflict was longer than in normal case.Or are there any other duplicates? JAn Dudík (talk) 18:59, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Experienced and skillfull at cs.wiki, including iw edits. --G3ron1mo (talk) 20:13, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I know JAnDBot from cs.wiki and hsb.wiki and I consider it trustworthy and useful. --Tchoř (talk) 21:23, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please note that this isn't a vote. If the bugs aren't fixed the bot won't be approved, regardless of the number of supports here. Regards, Vogone talk 22:18, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Opinions may vary, but I think that any bot with thousands of good edits and a sole known bad edit is still a useful bot. JAn's explanation of the said error does make sense, the probability of recurrence seems pretty low and JAn proposes an arangement to make it even lower. I have not checked it but I doubt that testing for duplicates and creating can be done as one atomic operation, so nothing better than diminishing the probability of an edit conflict can be done.
- And because there are no real bugs, the only real problem seems to be to convince about JAn's competence and trustworthiness. That has been the reason of my support comment. --Tchoř (talk) 23:12, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please note that this isn't a vote. If the bugs aren't fixed the bot won't be approved, regardless of the number of supports here. Regards, Vogone talk 22:18, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]