Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/L PBot 2
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Approved--Ymblanter (talk) 16:49, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
L PBot 2 edit
L PBot (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Operator: Lokal Profil (talk • contribs • logs)
Task/s: Adding statments for Architects, and sourcing existing statements, based on data from Arkitekter verksamma i Sverige (Q17373699)
Code: github , built on the pywikibot framework.
Function details: For each statement the bot checks if the statement already exists, if so it only adds the source (if not already present)
The properties added/sourced are the following (if present in the Arkitekter verksamma i Sverige (Q17373699) data)
The source is All of these with source made up of stated in (P248)=Arkitekter verksamma i Sverige (Q17373699) + stated in (P248)=date which the record was last modified
Tests: Example: [1], [2] Relevant contributions: [3] --Lokal Profil (talk) 15:26, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Unless there are any complaint or requests that I format the reference differently I'll go ahead and start running this for the rest of the objects. /Lokal Profil (talk) 16:54, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- P513 (P513) looks deprecated, you should probably not add that. What's the copyright status of your source data? CCO? Multichill (talk) 17:10, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I've actually skipped P513 (P513) in the this version since it is unclear whether it or an alias works better. Still thanks for the heads up about it being deprecated (very obvious if language setting is en, not so much if it is sv). The dataset is CC0, even made sure to add it to Arkitekter verksamma i Sverige (Q17373699) =) /Lokal Profil (talk) 09:48, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- P513 (P513) looks deprecated, you should probably not add that. What's the copyright status of your source data? CCO? Multichill (talk) 17:10, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I am going to approve this bot tomorrow provided there have been no objections.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:31, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]