Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Oversight/Esteban16
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Closed as successful--Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Esteban16 edit
Vote
RfP scheduled to end at 4 June 2020 18:12 (UTC)
- Esteban16 (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)
Hi, as stated by some users that the project needs a few more oversighters, I would like to apply for this. I have been an administrator for more than a year. I am a global sysop and global rollbacker, and I understand Wikidata and Wikimedia policies. I can also be found on multiples channels on IRC. My timezone is UTC-5, and I am active at night, time during there are less available sysops/OS. I am a native speaker of Spanish and I am able to understand other Romance/Latin languages such as Portuguese, Italian and Catalan, in addition to English. I am committed to the project, and would handle this role efficiently. Thank you, Esteban16 (talk) 18:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- PS: I am identified to the Wikimedia Foundation. Esteban16 (talk) 03:24, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Votes edit
- Support MisterSynergy (talk) 18:38, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- Ajraddatz (talk) 20:17, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 22:30, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support what else. —Eihel (talk) 23:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Rschen7754 00:12, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, thank you for helping. --Sotiale (talk) 04:15, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support ‐‐1997kB (talk) 07:30, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Alaa :)..! 09:42, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:07, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 12:47, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--باسم (talk) 16:25, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Epìdosis 17:10, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Kostas20142 (talk) 17:25, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support ミラP 01:32, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Flixwito^(•‿•)^ 04:05, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Thanks for volunteering and helping the team out in work! Bencemac (talk) 09:39, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Minorax (talk) 14:55, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- ¡Sí! —Hasley 21:00, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Matěj Suchánek (talk) 10:50, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Nehaoua (talk) 15:55, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support AFAIK active admin and contributor, knowledgeable about related tools, no canvassing issues. Thanks for contributing. --- Jura 16:24, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Trusted editor and regular offline meetup participant, can be trusted with private information. Deryck Chan (talk) 22:05, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, reliable and trusted user, no concern.-BRP ever 07:00, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Of-course! Keep up the good works. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 02:55, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Easy drive by support. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 15:21, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support · Sure, no concerns. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Simon Cobb (User:Sic19 ; talk page) 06:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 14:47, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Rzuwig► 15:38, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comments edit
- What's the basis for the project needing more oversighters? How much oversight request exist currently that need too much time to be serviced? ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 20:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChristianKl: @Ajraddatz:, an existing OS, indicated the amount of requests is a little high for them, and either way, having more to audit each others' actions is good (Sjoerddebruin is inactive so we effectively have a team of only two). Better timezone coverage is also needed; with Sjoerddebruin inactive we have no one to cover the middle of Europe's day, an important time for availability.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:14, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I think any project should have at least 4-5 OSes and CUs if they have any. Means that there is always adequate coverage and actions can be double-checked by others. -- Ajraddatz (talk) 20:18, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- ChristianKl: The amount of requests is not the only concern, but the coverage of the role as well. With very few OS, it is harder to act in emergencies. We have stewards to give us a hand in such cases, but we are a big project, and a considerable amount of local help is useful. Esteban16 (talk) 22:29, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, having coverage is also a valid reason.ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 12:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- ChristianKl: The amount of requests is not the only concern, but the coverage of the role as well. With very few OS, it is harder to act in emergencies. We have stewards to give us a hand in such cases, but we are a big project, and a considerable amount of local help is useful. Esteban16 (talk) 22:29, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The three oversighters that we have are unfortunately not the most active editors. When I reported a case earlier this year, it took them almost two days to react and respond, and in another earlier case they were not much quicker. More (active!) users with OS rights would actually be very useful, given that this is a sensitive role. —MisterSynergy (talk) 12:07, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]