Wikidata:Requests for permissions/RfRollback/February 2014

This page is an archive. Please do not modify it. Use the current page, even to continue an old discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Namnguyenvn

Namnguyenvn (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)

--Namnguyenvn (talk) 13:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Done Use it with care. Cheers. — ΛΧΣ²¹ 14:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

NahidSultan

NahidSultan (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)

NahidSultan (talk) 16:01, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Done --Jakob (talk) 16:07, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Comment: Just be careful with editing. Coincidentally, just before this request here, I checked four deletion requests that you made today. Of those four, two were only empty because an IP removed the sitelinks today. Of those two cases, one (Q1434846) was fine, as the IP moved the sitelink to another item (exactly the one that you mentioned in the deletion request, though I'm not sure if you noticed the IP's work), and the other one (Q12463160) actually was some kind of accident (only one of the sitelinks should have been removed, there was no need to remove the other one and therfore delete the item). That said, this has little to do with the rollbacker right and I hardly can imagine that you would have caused any harm here if you had had the rollbacker right, and so I have no objections in giving it to you, what King jakob already did anyway. --YMS (talk) 16:21, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I mostly revert vandalism related with IP so of course I've seen the first one. And the second one, I just apologies. Next time I will be more careful. Thanks :) --NahidSultan (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

It Is Me Here

It_Is_Me_Here (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)

I would like the Rollbacker right in order to fight vandalism more easily. I have undone vandalism and submitted deletion requests at Wikidata in the past, and am a Sysop at en.wp.

It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 18:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Well, you have undone vandalism just once (as I saw from your contributions), but rollbacker is not a big deal. However I give a decision for the next admin who stops here. I have no opinion how easily we should give these rights. --Stryn (talk) 20:09, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Done even though I didn't find many vandalism reverts here, I do see some at enwiki where you are an admin. Use it wisely. --AmaryllisGardener (talk) 20:13, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Hydriz

Hydriz (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)

I have been an administrator when Wikidata was in its early stages. I have resigned from it, but I continue to edit here and fight vandalism cross-wiki. The rollback right will help a lot for me. Thanks. Hydriz (talk) 15:49, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Done, thanks for volunteering. Vogone talk 16:22, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Emaus

Emaus (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)

I would like to get this flag to revert the vandal edits and incorrect edits of my bots. --Emaus (talk) 22:19, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Done Vogone talk 22:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. --Emaus (talk) 22:44, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

FDMS4

FDMS4 (talk • contribs • new items • new lexemes • SUL • Block log • User rights log • User rights • xtools)

Altough I would really like to help Wikidata, the only way doing so at the moment for me seems to be by adding item titles and sitelinks, and reverting obvious vandalism. I have editor (includes rollback) rights at the German Wikipedia (and patroller at the Commons). |FDMS 19:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Not done Only 174 edits; 2 reversions of vandalism. Considering that you have rollback elsewhere, 10-20 reversions of vandalism should be satisfactory. You can post on my talk page when you've done that. Thanks, 21:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Marking as Done per request on talk page for transparancy TBloemink _talk 10:03, 13 February 2014 (UTC)