Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC)

This will be the general space for discussion about the consultation for the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft guideline review page. For the smooth progress of this discussion, each section of the EDGR and each question of the drafting committee are divided into threads.

For comments related to the specific content of the Enforcement Draft Guideline, please respond to the paragraph with the same name as the paragraph to which it belongs.
If you would like to answer a question from drafting committee, please respond on the #Open questions for the Community paragraph.
If you have any additional comments or suggestions, please create a new sections.

Please see Enforcement draft guidelines review at meta wiki for a detailed information about current consultations. --YKo (WMF) (talk) 14:08, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please see Wikidata talk:Universal Code of Conduct consultation/2021 Local Language Consultation for Archive from February 2021

'Overview' edit

'Preventive work (articles 1 and 2 UCOC)' edit

'Responsive work (article 3 UCOC)' edit

'Principles for processing and filing of reported cases' edit

'Providing resources for processing cases' edit

'Types of violations and enforcement mechanism / groups' edit

'Recommendations for the reporting and processing tool' edit

'Recommendations for local enforcement structures' edit

'Recommendations for how to process appeals' edit

Open questions for the Community edit

Escalation: Where do the complaints go, what instance/body/judge is supposed to process them. edit

Regulations for appeal (after the previous question "Where do the complaints go" has been answered). edit

Should the U4C committee also decide individual cases or process appeals? edit

When should someone be able to initiate an appeal for a UCoC violation? edit

What kinds of behavior or evidence would we want to see before granting an appeal? edit

Who should handle the appeals process? edit

How often should someone be allowed to appeal a UCoC violation decision? edit

To what extent should individual Wikimedia projects be allowed to decide how they enforce the UCoC? edit

How will people be chosen for the U4C committee? edit

Our current recommended list of users include, but are not limited to: CheckUsers, oversighters, bureaucrats, administrators of local projects, arbitration committee members, Wikimedia Foundation employees, Affiliates, etc.)

Should an interim committee be formed while the "U4C" committee is being created? edit

Should global conduct committees, such as the Technical Code of Conduct committee, be merged into the proposed U4C? edit

General comments edit

No comments after almost a month, maybe this needs to be advertised in a wider forum? --Rs chen 7754 05:59, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
- Hello there, thanks for pointing this out. This has been advertised through beginning of review period, however, unlike the discussion in February, this is happening on all wikis, and there are no facilitator exclusively responsible for Wikidata. So it seems that some members of the Wikidata community are responding through other means such as meta. I will going through another announcement through Wikidata community, however this could be appreciated that if there are known place other than Project chat feel free to notify the consultation is still going. Thank you.--YKo (WMF) (talk) 04:16, 27 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic