BeLucky

Hi BeLucky,

you can't delete an item by hollowing it out. What's the problem with Phyllis Turk (Q118234788) for example?

Re your recent edits to deception (Q170028), dismissal (Q17052147), and parental alienation (Q1949144): A is a subclass of B only if all instances of A are instances of B. If any instances of A are not instances of B, then the most you can say with respect to classes is that A is partially coincident with (P1382) B. ~~~~

Totally understood your point. I liked your way of explaining and presenting the solution at the same point. Happy to learn .... will keep the concept in mind while contributing. Thanks.

I noticed that you marked a few properties as ready. While, as a property creator, I appreciate people paying attention to this, please note that there are specific criteria for when a property proposal is ready, laid out in Wikidata:Property creation. In particular, property proposals must be open for a week before they're ready for creation. I highly doubt that Wikidata:Property proposal/Umanity horse ID, for instance, will fail given its support, but it's only been two days since it opened. This period is to ensure that people have time to notice any potential issues. Once the week is up (and the other criteria are met, though those are a bit more subjective), then it's appropriate to mark a proposal as ready.

Hello! At a glance, it appears that the items you are creating have references, but they only have P813 and no actual reference as to where the claim is coming from. It is from a credible website, please add in P854 at the very minimum. If it is a written source, add in enough information that someone else can find the information in the source such as ISBN and page number. In addition, please do not "diagnose" people, either in statements or in descriptions. Thanks!

I see you are talking about Rana Khan (Q111040510) and Noman Khan (Q111653043). While adding people related to National Award for the Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities (Q15986359) found details in the news articles so added them, that's all (unable to find that source now). Anyways doesn't matter we can remove those parts anyways.

Those were two of them, yes. Thank you for taking the time to look for the source!

Saw your post in deletion requests. I am not framing anyone made those edits in the heat of adding items, that's all. Looks like I really need to find out those source to prove my point here. Kindly edit out those harsh allegations there.

I have struck them out now that they are gone. BTW if you do not have sources for the medical conditions, they should go too.

Marked for deletion anyway. Don't wanna beat on those more. Relatives of the public figure. Not the public figure themselves, so.

Removed all the objectionable items as not worth the time to find the source anyways.

Got it adding references to them. Thanks.