Logo of Wikidata

Welcome to Wikidata, Palotabarát!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

  • Introduction – An introduction to the project.
  • Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
  • Community portal – The portal for community members.
  • User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
  • Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
  • Project chat – Discussions about the project.
  • Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards! Tacsipacsi (talk) 00:05, 24 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orosz Gábor edit

Ez hol van a megadott forrásban? Mert én többször végigolvastam, de nem találom. Bináris (talk) 08:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ezzel kezdődik: "Elhunyt Dr. Orosz Gábor János (Cegléd, 1939 - Budapest, 2023)" Pallor (talk) 08:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ó, akkor tényleg vak vagyok, vagy közben módosították, de az nem valószínű. Bináris (talk) 09:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Állampolgárság edit

Szia! Sokáig csak Magyarországot jelöltem be az állampolgársági rovatban honfitárs személyek szócikkei mellett, de annyi korholást kaptam az elmúlt években (nemcsak tőled) a WD nem szakszerű használata miatt, hogy elkezdtem egyre jobban figyelni az apróbb részletekre is. Mióta pedig felfedeztem, hogy van a WD-n az országnak ilyen államalakulat-szintű bontása is, azóta többször alkalmaztam is személyek szócikkeinél. Jól értem, hogy végül is nincs erre szükség? Solymári (talk) 15:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Szia! A rövid válasz az, hogy nem, erre nincs szükség. A Hungary (Q28) állampolgárság-jelzést én soha nem tettem szóvá, nem javítottam, ezen kár volt változtatni. Ugyanakkor azokat az állampolgárság-jelzéseket, amik nem a Q28 elemmel történtek, az általad létrehozott elemekben már többtucatszor javítottam. Azt viszont - talán negyedik alkalommal - megemlítem, hogy azokat a javításokat, amiket az általad létrehozott elemeken eszközölnek, érdemes figyelemmel kísérni a figyelőlistád segítségével, és az ott tapasztaltakat beépíteni a következő szerkesztéseidbe, mert az eredményez fejlődést a szerkesztéseidben. Az egyéb megoldások eddig csak a munkavégzés minőségének a hullámzását és számos téves szerkesztést eredményeztek. Pallor (talk) 09:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Csepin Péter Q16518629 edit

Szia! A PIM adatlapon szerepelt a politikus (foglalkozás), ezért írtam be. Üdv. Tulipanos (talk) 05:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Áh... értem. Majd írok nekik. Kösz! Pallor (talk) 07:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

In service of edit

I appreciate your support for the"in service of" qualifierwhich Icame upwithmaybe a yearago in ordertoresolve a problemi hadfoundwith the many differentdiplomatic positions being definedin Wikidata, too baditdidnä't get created upon therecent submission asa proposal,which I didn't learn about until today, maybewecanacttogether to revive theprposal and get this ball rollingagain.--SM5POR (talk) 11:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Dear SM5POR! Unfortunately, my English is not good, and I was reprimanded for it at this very discussion. That's why I don't want to start the procedure again, but if you do it, I will support you.
By the way, it is interesting to me that you would use it in diplomacy, since there I see that there has been a good solution for this topic for a long time, the diplomatic mission sent (P531). There, the possibilities of use are well illustrated by the example on the property's page.
But as I wrote, if you restart the discussion, I support it. Pallor (talk) 09:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Swpbː Ihope we canrestart thediscussion somewhere on the of (P642) property deprecation project pages, and i just ask for some assistance in clearing a place for that discussion, As to diplomatic mission sent (P531) which we will have to relate to as well, I discovered that property only long after I had explored the many ad-hoc items such as British ambassador to France and whatever I saw, in short, it looked like amess, and I wanted to untangle it, as "of" in some cases referred to the country the ambasador served, and in some cases referred to where he was sent, which is why I came up with those two suggested properties, to be used in conjunction when appropriate.SM5POR (talk) 08:58, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Embassies edit

Hello Pallor, I'm writing to you again about embassies. As I said before, embassies are considered organizations, therefore they should not use P131 because they are not a physical object. Instead, they should be linked to the places they operate in. This: https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q572567&oldid=prev&diff=2153189917 is an example of the old mixup. The source Archinform is about architecture and buildings: the embassy building is located in Vienna, and it should have its own item with relevant information. The organization has its seat in that building, and the building hosts the organization, so the two items will be linked. I'm willing to help detangle the mess, but we should proceed in order to avoid mistakes. Regards, Arpyia (talk) 17:24, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply