Wikidata:Property proposal/case number (mainland China)
case number (mainland China) edit
Return to Wikidata:Property proposal/Authority control
Description | identifier for a legal case in the jurisdiction of mainland China |
---|---|
Data type | External identifier |
Domain | mainland China court decision (Q125456254), legal case (Q2334719) |
Example 1 | Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (Q183080) → 288514 |
Example 2 | Strasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification (Q3604191) → 291784 |
Example 3 | Leader of the Opposition (Q20725785) → 199188 |
Example 4 | Copyright Act 1911 (Q5169215) → 180315 |
External links | Use in sister projects: [ar] • [de] • [en] • [es] • [fr] • [he] • [it] • [ja] • [ko] • [nl] • [pl] • [pt] • [ru] • [sv] • [vi] • [zh] • [commons] • [species] • [wd] • [en.wikt] • [fr.wikt]. |
Planned use | To be used for adding all court decisions from mainland China. |
Number of IDs in source | around 45 574 000 cases assigned with a case number in the year of 2023.[1] |
Expected completeness | always incomplete (Q21873886) (Not all cases have written judgement text published to the public.) |
Formatter URL | https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/$1 |
Country | mainland China (Q7262427) |
See also | Supreme Court of Canada case number (P12592), U. S. Supreme Court docket number (P7063), Supreme Court of Sweden case number (P8407) |
Distinct-values constraint | yes |
Motivation edit
This property is a copycat of Supreme Court of Canada case number (P12592) to help identify cases in mainland China, i.e. the WTO China.
Case number is an unique* id-like text assigned for one legal proceeding, referencing the year the case was filed, court responsible for the judgement, trial type (first/appeal/retrial/restraining order etc.) and a sequence number of this trial type in that court.
It is shown on all formal legal documents related to that case. The case number for the previous legal proceeding must be cited in the appealing judgement text. See red links in s:zh:最高人民法院(2018)最高法行再128号行政裁定书 – (year) means legal proceedings, while 〔year〕 means out-of-court administrative decisions and appeals (lit. Administrative Reconsideration).
However, when the court doesn't want people to dig into a specific case, they don't exposure the case number in the press releases. For example, the case number or its full judgement text was never published for Kris Wu scandal (Q107612866), as of today.
Note: It is considered unique for cases filed in the recent years, using computer systems. I can't guarantee all case numbers don't conflict with each other before the nation-wide digitization, like before 2010.
I don't suggest restricting user input with regex. Third party like WIPO Lex use their own way to transliteration case numbers (e.g. Commercial Press Co., Ltd. V. Sinolingua Co., Ltd. (2016) J 73 MC No. 277, Beijing Intellectual Property Court) and the result doesn't fit to existing formatting, but it's still worth preserving when no corresponding Chinese number is available. A regex may also block case numbers before ~1970 from entering.
-XsLiDian (talk) 05:41, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
References
- ↑ "最高人民法院工作报告".
全国各级法院收案4557.4万件,结案4526.8万件,同比分别增长15.6%、13.4%。
For the year of 2023: "45574k new cases; 45268k newly-resolved cases."
Discussion edit
Notified participants of WikiProject Authority control Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 11:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- So there are different case numbers in english and chinese? I'm not sure I understand. Are we going to track both with qualifiers? BrokenSegue (talk) 16:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think it's like UN document symbol (P3069) and the value should be unique, while this case number is a combination of Arabic numeral (Q29961325), brackets (Q174565) and sinograms (Q8201). I'm not sure whether the datatype should be external-id or string.Kethyga (talk) 10:41, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support IF it's allowed for US and CA, it has to be allowed for ZH... Though why we need hundreds of thousands of court cases here, is beyond me --Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 13:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- @XsLiDian:, could you please clarify the comments above by @Vladimir Alexiev, BrokenSegue:. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 07:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- @XsLiDian:, could you please clarify the comments above by @Vladimir Alexiev, BrokenSegue, Kethyga:. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ZI Jony: you modified the proposal? BrokenSegue (talk) 14:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- @BrokenSegue:, I've added examples which exists in Wikidata. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 14:08, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ZI Jony: you modified the proposal? BrokenSegue (talk) 14:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- @XsLiDian:, could you please clarify the comments above by @Vladimir Alexiev, BrokenSegue, Kethyga:. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 13:24, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- @XsLiDian:, could you please clarify the comments above by @Vladimir Alexiev, BrokenSegue:. Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 07:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)