File:Journée Wikipédia, objet scientifique 2013 Alexandre Hocquet3.JPG
Size of this preview: 739 × 600 pixels. Other resolutions: 296 × 240 pixels | 592 × 480 pixels | 947 × 768 pixels | 1,262 × 1,024 pixels | 2,525 × 2,048 pixels | 3,550 × 2,880 pixels.
Original file (3,550 × 2,880 pixels, file size: 849 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
Summary
| Description |
Français : Alexandre Hocquet, professeur à l’Université de Lorraine, venu parler de « Wikipédia en tant que forum : une analyse ethnographique de la production d’articles » durant la Journée d’étude : « Wikipédia, objet scientifique non identifié », organisée par le « Projet exploratoire » WEUSC ; 5 juin 2013 à l’Institut des sciences de la communication du CNRS (ISCC, Paris). -> 1) Quels usages actuels et potentiels de Wikipédia dans les domaines des sciences, de l’éducation et de la documentation ; 2) point sur les méthodologies et les travaux d’évaluation des connaissances sur Wikipédia ; propositions de nouvelles approches d’expertises par la recherche dans un contexte interdisciplinaire. Objet de la journée : analyser les rapports que scientifiques et sciences entretiennent avec Wikipédia autour de 3 problématiques : 1. place de l’expertise et celle du chercheur-contributeur ou expert dans Wikipédia ; 2. gouvernance de Wikipédia, de ses régimes d’édition, de ses enjeux de neutralité, de ses sources ; 3. Wikipédia comme objet de recherche, de corpus ou terrain d’analyseEnglish: Alexander Hocquet, professor at the University of Lorraine (France), came to speek about " Wikipedia as a forum: an ethnographic analysis of the production of goods. " during the Study Day "Wikipedia, unidentified scientific object" June 5, 2013 - Institute of Communication Sciences of the CNRS (ISCC, Paris), organized by the "Pathfinder Project" WEUSC -> 1) What current and potential uses of Wikipedia in the fields of science, education and documentation, 2) review the methodologies and assessment work on Wikipedia knowledge, proposals for new approaches expertise through research in an interdisciplinary context. Subject of the day: analyze reports that scientists and science have with Wikipedia around three issues: 1. up expertise and that of the researcher or expert contributor to Wikipedia; 2. Wikipedia governance, its publishing systems, its issues of neutrality, its sources; 3. Wikipedia as a research subject, or field of corpus analysis. |
| Date | |
| Source | Own work |
| Author | Lamiot |
Licensing
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
| Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| current | 21:46, 7 June 2013 | | 3,550 × 2,880 (849 KB) | Lamiot | User created page with UploadWizard |
File usage
The following 3 pages use this file:
Global file usage
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on da.wikipedia.org
