Lexeme talk:L1
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Jdforrester in topic Question and resource
Question and resource
editFirst, I tried to put the actual cuneiform sign : 𒂼 (U+120BC, GA2×AN).
Then the language code is "mis-x-Q36790" but shouldn't it be "sux" (which is the ISO 639-3 code for Sumerian as indicated on Sumerian (Q36790)).
Tricky question: how could we says that 𒂼 contains a 𒀭? (derived from lexeme (P5191) is a bit of a stretch here)
Finally, not sure where to put it, so here is a resource for this lexemes : entry « ama MOTHER » in the The Pennsylvania Sumerian Dictionary.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 06:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- @VIGNERON::
- the language code is "mis-x-Q36790" but shouldn't it be "sux"
- There's no support for that language code in MediaWiki yet, which is why it has to be represented as mis-x-Q36790/mis-x-Q401.
- how could we says that 𒂼 contains a 𒀭
- For cuneiform and other composed scripts (like Hangul), I agree that we'll want a new set of properties to illustrate those, rather than over-load ones related to etymology.
- James F. (talk) 17:12, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note that, some years later, this is indeed now shown as
sux-xsux
(and the Latin transliteration assux-latn
). James F. (talk) 16:50, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note that, some years later, this is indeed now shown as