Property talk:P1170
Documentation
type of signal transmitted by a device
Description | The type of signals a machinery can emit. | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data type | Item | |||||||||
Template parameter | en:Template:Infobox spaceflight : "trans_band" (but detected and emitted signals are together) | |||||||||
Domain | According to this template:
all kinds of machines that do transmitting
When possible, data should only be stored as statements | |||||||||
Allowed values | signal (Q174984) (note: this should be moved to the property statements) | |||||||||
Example | Gaia (Q767805) → S band (Q2018880) | |||||||||
Source | technical sources (note: this information should be moved to a property statement; use property source website for the property (P1896)) | |||||||||
See also | received signal type (P1194) | |||||||||
Lists |
| |||||||||
Proposal discussion | Proposal discussion | |||||||||
Current uses |
| |||||||||
Search for values |
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1170#Type Q2424752, Q40218, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1170#Value type Q174984, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P1170#Entity types
Name edit
If the allowed values of this property are bands, why name it "transmitted signal"? The corresponding template parameter also is named with the term "band" - why change it to "signal"?--Anders Feder (talk) 15:40, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Since the property description defines it as "the type of signals a machinery can emit", and that seems most useful, that is what I've renamed it to.[1]--Anders Feder (talk) 15:57, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
And consequently I've removed the limitation to "bands" because that was never either in the name of the property or its definition in the description.[2]--Anders Feder (talk) 16:00, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
broaden this property? edit
This property came up as a useful qualifier for Wikidata:Property proposal/attenuation coefficient - however the present description seems to limit the scope so that wouldn't be applicable. Is it ok with the people who proposed this to broaden the scope for this purpose? It doesn't seem to have been used much so far for the original purpose anyway... ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:30, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- @Tobias1984, Paperoastro, Danrok, Jakec: as proposers and creator; @Anders Feder, Thibdx: as others interested. ArthurPSmith (talk) 17:33, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- I propose to broaden the scope of this property in Wikidata:Property proposal/sends & receives. --Push-f (talk) 03:48, 29 October 2022 (UTC)