Talk:Q1503302
Latest comment: 2 years ago by JesseW in topic This appears to be mostly unused
Autodescription — abstract geographic object (Q1503302)
description: a representation of a geographic entity NOT a real thing in the world
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “abstract geographic object” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
abstract geographic object⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
This appears to be mostly unused
editExcept for the sitelink to the German Wikipedia, this could pretty much be removed. It's also not very clearly described, and seems to have been regularly mistaken for geographic location (Q2221906), causing subclasses to get mistakenly described as abstract representations, not real objects. I'll add the warnings I can think of, but I'd be glad for other suggestions of ways to avoid this in the future? JesseW (talk) 15:51, 31 July 2022 (UTC)