Talk:Q2778715
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Neo-Jay in topic Reverting action semi-log paper
Autodescription — semi-log plot (Q2778715)
description: plot that has one axis on a logarithmic scale and the other on a linear scale
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “semi-log plot” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
For help about classification, see Wikidata:Classification.
- Parent classes (classes of items which contain this one item)
- Subclasses (classes which contain special kinds of items of this class)
- ⟨
semi-log plot⟩ on wikidata tree visualisation (external tool)(depth=1) - Generic queries for classes
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Reverting action semi-log paper edit
Hello Neo-Jay,
I moved da:Enkeltlogaritmisk papir from d:Q2778715 (semi-log plot) to d:Q1867955 (logarithmic paper) because that Danish article is clearly about the paper; not about the plot. The Danish word 'papir' means 'paper'; not 'plot'.
Why did you revert it? Erik Wannee (talk) 23:27, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
- The above message was posted to User:Neo-Jay's talk page at 23:27, 23 February 2020.
- @Erik Wannee: da:Enkeltlogaritmisk papir refers to only semi-logarithmic (single-logarithmic) paper, not logarithmic paper. There is no perfect Wikidata item for da:Enkeltlogaritmisk papir since Q2778715 refers to semi-logarithmic plot and Q1867955 refers to logarithmic paper. I moved da:Enkeltlogaritmisk papir from Q1867955 back to Q2778715 because I think Q2778715 is more relevant. Q1867955 (logarithmic paper) can refer to both da:Enkeltlogaritmisk papir (single-logarithmic paper) and da:Dobbeltlogaritmisk papir (double-logarithmic paper). da:Dobbeltlogaritmisk papir (double-logarithmic paper) is included in Q2091879 (log-log plot) now. If da:Enkeltlogaritmisk papir (single-logarithmic paper) should be included in Q1867955 (logarithmic paper), why shouldn't da:Dobbeltlogaritmisk papir (double-logarithmic paper) be included in Q1867955? --Neo-Jay (talk) 23:44, 23 February 2020 (UTC)