Talk:Q3107354
Autodescription — Raqqada (Q3107354)
- Useful links:
- View it! – Images depicting the item on Commons
- Report on constraint conformation of “Raqqada” claims and statements. Constraints report for items data
- See also
- This documentation is generated using
{{Item documentation}}.
Removed image edit
Just to explain why I removed the image that was included here: I'm quite confident that there is no basis for claiming the wall in that image is part of the palace. I've explained the same thing on the English Wikipedia article's talk page (see here). Scholarly sources are very clear: historic Raqqada is only an archeological site, not even fully excavated, and there is nothing standing (and nothing reconstructed either to my knowledge). No source other than the image uploader's own words claims this or any other standing wall today is part of the palace. I've had to remove the image directly from this Wikidata entry because otherwise it keeps appearing in the Wikipedia article's infobox automatically. If you believe I'm wrong on this, please explain, ideally on the English article's talk page (where I've posted the same explanation for convenience). R Prazeres (talk) 05:29, 25 December 2022 (UTC)