Belteshassar

Hi, I was wondering if you documented your project to import Swedish court decisions and how you collected and imported everything into Wikidata? I'm interested in doing something similar in Australia so I'm curious to hear about other projects first.

Hello, thanks for contacting me. You can check out this page for some documentation about the project.

Hej, jag ville länka https://www.domstol.se/hogsta-forvaltningsdomstolen/avgoranden/2021/89842/ men hittade den inte i WD.

Är du sugen på att samspela om att lägga in alla dessa domar också?

@Ainali kanske vill hänga på?

Hej! Det skulle nog kunna vara bra. Jag gjorde lite tester efter arbetet med hd. Har kod för att skrapa domarna och en årgång formaterad i json som man borde kunna skapa nya objekt utifrån. Ett exempelobjekt finns också: Q97025581.

Snyggt exempel!

@Popperipopp vill du hänga på?

@Belteshassar finns koden delat någonstans?

Dear Belteshassar,

I hope you are doing good,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at King’s College London, and I work on a project as part of my PhD research that develops a personalized recommendation system to suggest Wikidata items for the editors based on their interests and preferences. I am collaborating on this project with Elena Simperl and Miaojing Shi.

I would love to talk with you to know about your current ways to choose the items you work on in Wikidata and understand the factors that might influence such a decision. Your cooperation will give us valuable insights into building a recommender system that can help improve your editing experience.  

Participation is completely voluntary. You have the option to withdraw at any time. Your data will be processed under the terms of UK data protection law (including the UK General Data Protection Regulation (UK GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018). The information and data that you provide will remain confidential; it will only be stored on the password-protected computer of the researchers. We will use the results anonymized (?) to provide insights into the practices of the editors in item selection processes for editing and publish the results of the study to a research venue. If you decide to take part, we will ask you to sign a consent form, and you will be given a copy of this consent form to keep.

If you’re interested in participating and have 15-20 minutes to chat (I promise to keep the time!), please either contact me at kholoudsaa@gmail.com or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdmmFHaiB20nK14wrQJgfrA18PtmdagyeRib3xGtvzkdn3Lgw/viewform?usp=sf_link with your choice of the times that work for you.

I’ll follow up with you to figure out what method is the best way for us to connect.

Please contact me using the email mentioned above if you have any questions or require more information about this project.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.

Regards

Kholoud

In relation to your query at Wikidata talk:WikiProject Law, is it necessary to split the publication Nytt juridiskt arkiv (Q10604998) into separate items for each part and volume?

Scholia will be able to show all the decisions at once if everything is published in the one publication item, but at the moment it can only show one year at a time like this: https://scholia.toolforge.org/venue/Q97501702

Thank you, that is an excellent point that I hadn't thought of. It may be worth ditching the individual volumes.

I noticed this edit of yours where you add P1343 by SAOB. Can going to the identifier for a certain word(talking generally about all words described on SAOB) help an editor add any data to Lexemes? I'm not talking about a problem but I'm trying to have a discussion about if SAOB is of any use to me in my edits or if I should just ignore it?('copyrighted resources = not resources' is my kind of thinking) ~~~~

Hey! Thank you for the question. Most of SAOB is actually rather old (first volume published 1898) and therefore I understand the printed volumes are not protected, though the website may be protected by database rights. I basically only use it to connect existing lexemes and lexemes I have created based on my own understanding of the language. I sometimes also use it as a reference for etymology, but that’s about it.

For a user, the identifier and ability to click through to the source can definitely have value as this is the most comprehensive dictionary of the Swedish language.

hej 😃 vill du vara med på telegram i leksemgrppen eller svenska gruppen? Det händer grejer där typ varje dag. Se https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Telegram

Uppskattar din inbjudan, men jag är redan med i båda grupperna 😃

Hello, how are you? Would you protect that page due to "edits/vandalism" like that?

Hey! All well, thank you. Not sure you’re asking the right person here. I don’t think I have ever edited that item and I don’t have any rights that allow me to protect pages. Cheers!

I see. Well, I don't know how to edit here very well, haha. Is there any page/place in which I can make that request, like a "Protection page" or something like that? Thanks for your time.

I’ve never had to ask for that myself, but I think this is the place to bring it up: Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard

Hi. I just spotted Special:Diff/1258113111 and reacted to the page(s) (P304) qualifier of cites work (P2860). The reason I reacted was that when I looked at the document it only has 94 pages, yet several of the references are for page numbers higher than this.

Hey. My thought behind this is that the page number refers to the cited page in the cited document. This is inferred from the literal text in the citing document, e.g. Prop. 2017/18:49 s. 116. I realize when you point this out that one could read this as the page in the citing document where the citation is found, but that was not my intention.

This would actually affect pretty much every document I have added citations for so it would be important to get it right. Do you know if there is any documentation on this use case? I couldn't find any on the property talk pages.

Hi. I hadn't thought about the page number being used that way. Thinking about it now however I feel sure your interpretation is the correct one since it qualifies the citation. The page on which the citation occurs would be part of the reference. Sorry for the scare :)

Hi! First of all, thank you for having imported https://mix-n-match.toolforge.org/#/catalog/3811 related to Uppsala University Alvin ID (P6821). However, I've just noticed there are some duplicate entries, such as https://mix-n-match.toolforge.org/#/entry/97591203 (with correct id "alvin-person:17846") and https://mix-n-match.toolforge.org/#/entry/97524653 (with incomplete id "17846"). There are at least 240 cases of incomplete ids. Could you re-import the catalog on Mix'n'match excluding all the incomplete ids? When you do it, I can delete the old catalog. Thank you very much in advance!

Hey! Sure, I can give it a look. Unfortunate mishap but I might take the chance to try and improve the descriptions also. I’ve noticed some include additional biographical notes that are rather helpful when trying to find the right match.

Ok, perfect. When you succeed in importing a new catalog, please inform me here, so that I can delete the old catalog. Thanks!

So, update. I have:

• removed incorrect values of Uppsala University Alvin ID (P6821)
• created new https://mix-n-match.toolforge.org/#/catalog/3919
• deleted old https://mix-n-match.toolforge.org/#/catalog/3811

Feel free to create a new catalog with better descriptions, of course, and let me know when you do it!

Thank you! And sorry for the delay on my end.