Open main menu

User talk:Joshbaumgartner

About this board

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Joshbaumgartner/Archive 1 on 2016-02-26.

PMG (talkcontribs)
Joshbaumgartner (talkcontribs)

Looks like it should have been the alias, not the label. Seems fixed now, thanks!

PMG (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Fletcher"
Micru (talkcontribs)
Joshbaumgartner (talkcontribs)

Excellent, will keep it in mind next time around. Thanks.

Reply to "New properties"

Maurizio Mediani (Q16575602) = (Q23664385) ?

ParaBenT (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Maurizio Mediani (Q16575602) = (Q23664385) ?"
Micru (talkcontribs)

Hi Josh, your property list runs up to 4600-4699, but there are almost 5k properties. Could you please update the list?

Reply to "Property list"
Danrok (talkcontribs)
Joshbaumgartner (talkcontribs)

I agree, I'll use that in the future. Thanks for the pointer.

Reply to ""order" event for ships"
Pmt (talkcontribs)

As property  effective firing range now is ready for use I invite you to support the Property proposal/Caliber as I see this as a value also defining a data for a gun or cannon. Best regards

Reply to "Property proposal/Caliber"
Ymblanter (talkcontribs)

I see that you created this item, though the category never had any sitelinks and is automatically not notable. Was this the idea?

Joshbaumgartner (talkcontribs)

Missed adding the sitelink, its fixed now. Thanks!

Ymblanter (talkcontribs)

Great, thanks.

Reply to "Q29642098"
ValterVB (talkcontribs)

In RFD there are one or more item proposed for the deletion created by you. If you do not agree you can participate in the debate

Reply to "Item to be delete"
Pasleim (talkcontribs)
Reply to "Unused properties"

Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey

MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs)

(That message in other languages: العربية • ‎bosanski • ‎català • ‎Deutsch • ‎Esperanto • ‎français • ‎עברית • ‎polski • ‎português • ‎português do Brasil • ‎русский • ‎اردو • ‎中文 – ‎translate that message)


Like some other community members, you are using Flow.

An increasing number of communities now use Flow or are considering it. Although Flow itself is not scheduled for major development during 2016 fiscal year, the Collaboration Team remains interested in the project and in providing an improved system for structured discussions.

You can help us make decisions about the way forward in this area by sharing your thoughts about Flow — what works, doesn't work or should be improved?

Please fill out this survey (available in multiple languages), which is administered by a third-party service. It will not require an email or your username. See our privacy statement.

Thanks for your ideas and opinions about Flow!

Trizek (WMF), on behalf of the Collaboration team, 11:56, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Reply to "Please take part in the Flow satisfaction survey"
There are no older topics
Return to the user page of "Joshbaumgartner".