User talk:Liuxinyu970226

Previous discussion was archived at User talk:Liuxinyu970226/Archive 1 on 2019-09-02.

International School of Engineering (Chulalongkorn University) is an item that does not exist on wikidata, however, Chulalongkorn University does exist here. Just wondering if the university item on wikdata can link to it somehow? Thanks in advance

That seems created as International School of Engineering (Q16892679), if not this item please poke me again here, thx.

Thanks for the speedy response.

The item I was asking about is the international school of engineering at Chulalongkorn University which is located in Bangkok. International School of Engineering (Q16892679) is located somewhere in India.

I also found another one: The International Engineering School (Q7742294), which is at a university in Israel, but I see no link from Q7742294 to Tel Aviv University (Q319239). Is a link not required?

Thanks again

嗨！Liuxinyu970226，

您收到此通知，是因为您作为一名中文的翻译者在Wikidata注册了。页面Wikidata:Vandalism已提供翻译。您可在此翻译：

• 翻译为中文

这个页面有高重要度。

非常感谢您的帮助。像您一样的翻译者正在不断努力帮助Wikidata成为一个真正多语言的社群。

您可以更改您的通知设置。

感谢您！ Wikidata翻译协调员‎, 02:46, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

嗨！Liuxinyu970226，

您收到此通知，是因为您作为一名中文的翻译者在Wikidata注册了。页面Wikidata:Eighth Birthday已提供翻译。您可在此翻译：

• 翻译为中文

这个页面有低重要度。

非常感谢您的帮助。像您一样的翻译者正在不断努力帮助Wikidata成为一个真正多语言的社群。

您可以更改您的通知设置。

感谢您！ Wikidata翻译协调员‎, 10:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

嗨！Liuxinyu970226，

您收到此通知，是因为您作为一名中文的翻译者在Wikidata注册了。页面Template:Hello已提供翻译。您可在此翻译：

• 翻译为中文

这个页面有中重要度。

非常感谢您的帮助。像您一样的翻译者正在不断努力帮助Wikidata成为一个真正多语言的社群。

您可以更改您的通知设置。

感谢您！ Wikidata翻译协调员‎, 19:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Last night my changes where removed because they where not helpful you said but there where right

Hi! Please see this edition. Now if you know how to delete pages - you can delete the page you created. Thanks anyway... ~~~~

Done, thx.

Can you welcome me, no one had welcomed me yet here. Best, KMagz04 (talk) 12:48, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Share your experience in this survey

Hi V72pe4lcmra7kwku,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikidata and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 17:37, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Hey Liuxinyu970226, I do not understand your edit comment in Special:Diff/1050974215. What do you mean with "perfects", and which "reverts" do you refer to? Can you please clarify? Thanks.

But then, a fact is that the ExternalUse template on that page was populated several times, and has too many duplicate entries, aren't they?

Maybe I mentioned a wrong user, this problem was happened before that, I don't know why

Well, I don't know. As far as I can see, I did nothing to the property (or property talk page) that could have affected the ExternalUse templates; thus I wondered a lot about your edit comment.

ExternalUse templates are pretty messy anyways. Sometimes the template itself is transcluded several times on a single property talk page. Not sure whether it is worth the effort to format it properly, as the next bot run will likely mess it up again.

So what's the correct thing I should do? Ask Krbot's owner?

Yes, you could try to contact Ivan.

According to my experience, the bot occasionally just adds templates which newly use that property, but it probably does not remove templates which do no longer use the property. It also does not make much effort to consolidate the list of templates to a useful format (e.g. grouping by wiki, and then list templates alphabetically or so).

Whether Ivan will fix this… I don't know. Unfortunately, he does not publish his code and his bot runs on a local machine which means you can't just submit a fix to a code repo.

Having thought about that once more…

• There is some discussion from past years about {{ExternalUse}} on Template talk:ExternalUse.
• According to an older comment by Ivan on that page, he is using a purely heuristical and relatively expensive approach to collect external property use from template pages. This might have changed meanwhile as we got more sophisticated property use tracking methods, but I think it still is a complicated process.
• When we try to systematically improve the content of the template parameter of {{ExternalUse}}, we should also consider to overhaul this template completely. Some options:
  • Do not use {{ExternalUse}} any longer, and move to statements on properties. User:Pigsonthewing has suggested this on Template talk:ExternalUse a while ago. Not sure, however, whether it scales properly for properties that have a lot of external use.
  • Continue using {{ExternalUse}}, but do not store the content on property talk pages any longer. A property talk page subpage such as "Property talk:P17/externaluse" could be easier to maintain in good shape, and it could be automatically transcluded by {{Property documentation}} if existing and non-empty.
  • Continue using {{ExternalUse}}, but do not store the content as a large chunk of unstructured wikitext inside it. Invent some template structure that helps to display the external use properly. This could/should also be possible for the previous proposal.

So I'm in favor of the first, because the function is more and more likely things that a Special page should do.

Well, we do not have a special page yet and it appears difficult to make one. From what I can see, there are:

• Special:EntityUsage pages on local wikis. They do not list which templates/modules use specific Wikidata properties.
• I think some wikis categorize Wikidata use. However, this is done manually as well.
• Use Cirrus' insource: code search functionality in Template: and Module: namespace. This probably yields a lot of false-positives.
• …

Mind that there is also need to track really external use, i.e. use outside of any Wikimedia project. That cannot be done with special pages anyways, and likely not with property statements as well.

Share your experience in this survey

Hi V7p6xqpn4f7oi1jo,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:53, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Dear Community Insights Survey owner, I'm Liuxinyu970226, NOT "V7p6xqpn4f7oi1jo".